Model Comparison
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
vs. Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Open 100B (Reasoning)4 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
30.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) leads Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B by 1.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) wins 4 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, HLE.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B | Top Pick Up Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Nov 11, 2024 | Dec 17, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 28.3 | 30.0 |
| Intelligence | 7.1 | 15.1 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 41.7% | 65.7% |
| MMLU Pro | 63.5% | — |
| HLE | 3.8% | 9.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 29.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | 76.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 12.0% | — |
| SciCode | 27.1% | 26.9% |
| LCR | — | 36.0% |
| IFBench | — | 57.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 48.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 30.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
