Model Comparison
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
vs. Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba, Allen Institute for AI
Recommended Pick
Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
30.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B leads Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B by 2.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B wins 7 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, MMLU Pro.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
Allen Institute for AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B | Top Pick Al Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Allen Institute for AI |
| Release Date | Nov 11, 2024 | Jan 30, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 28.3 | 30.9 |
| Intelligence | 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 41.7% | 51.6% |
| MMLU Pro | 63.5% | 71.6% |
| HLE | 3.8% | 3.5% |
| LiveCodeBench | 29.5% | 29.1% |
| MATH 500 | 76.7% | 77.8% |
| AIME (Original) | 12.0% | 13.3% |
| SciCode | 27.1% | 30.2% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 30.9 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis