Model Comparison
Qwen2 Instruct 72B
vs. Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)10 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen2 Instruct 72B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)
31.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen2 Instruct 72B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen2 Instruct 72B by 5.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) wins 10 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen2 Instruct 72B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen2 Instruct 72B | Top Pick Al Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.70/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $2.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $1.22/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Jun 7, 2024 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 99.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1076ms |
| Latency | — | 1076ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 26.3 | 31.9 |
| Intelligence | 6.0 | 8.6 |
| Math | — | 19.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 37.1% | 53.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 62.2% | 72.7% |
| HLE | 3.7% | 4.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 15.9% | 28.8% |
| MATH 500 | 70.1% | 86.9% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 19.7% |
| AIME (Original) | 14.7% | 30.3% |
| SciCode | 22.9% | 28.0% |
| LCR | — | 0.0% |
| IFBench | — | 31.5% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2 Instruct 72B offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 31.9 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen2 Instruct 72B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
