Model Comparison
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3.7 Max
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.7 Max 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
15.5 reasoning / $0.19/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
$0.11/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.7 Max
62.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.7 Max
50.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) is 22.7x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.7 Max.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.7 Max leads Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) by 46.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.7 Max leads Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) by 48.7 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.7 Max wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.11/1M | $2.50/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.42/1M | $7.50/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.19/1M | $3.75/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Apr 28, 2025 | May 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 153.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1622ms |
| Latency | — | 17316ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 20.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 15.5 | 62.3 |
| Intelligence | 5.7 | 56.6 |
| Coding | 1.4 | 50.1 |
| Math | 10.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 23.1% | 92.3% |
| MMLU Pro | 23.1% | — |
| HLE | 5.2% | 38.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 7.3% | — |
| MATH 500 | 52.1% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 10.3% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 1.7% | — |
| SciCode | 4.1% | 48.8% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 69.0% |
| IFBench | 21.9% | 80.5% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 14.6% | 94.7% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.0% | 50.8% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.11/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.7 Max has the strongest reasoning profile with a 62.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.7 Max reaches a 50.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3.7 Max
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
