Model Comparison

Qwen3 Max Thinking
vs. MiniMax-M2.1

Comparing 2 AI models · 5 benchmarks · Alibaba, MiniMax

Chat with Qwen3 & MiniMax-M2.1

Most Affordable

MiniMax logo MiniMax-M2.1

$0.30/1M

Highest Intelligence

Alibaba logo Qwen3 Max Thinking

86.1% GPQA

Best for Coding

MiniMax logo MiniMax-M2.1

32.8 Coding Index

Price Difference

4.0x

input cost range

Composite Indices

Intelligence, Coding, Math

Standard Benchmarks

Academic and industry benchmarks

Benchmark Winners

5 tests
Alibaba logo

Qwen3 Max Thinking

2
  • GPQA
  • HLE
MiniMax logo

MiniMax-M2.1

3
  • MMLU Pro
  • LiveCodeBench
  • AIME 2025
Metric
Alibaba logo Qwen3 Max Thinking
Alibaba
MiniMax logo MiniMax-M2.1
MiniMax
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost $1.20/1M$0.30/1M
Output Cost $6.00/1M$1.20/1M
Blended (3:1) $2.40/1M $0.52/1M
Specifications
Organization AlibabaMiniMax
Release Date Jan 26, 2026Dec 23, 2025
Performance & Speed
Throughput 36.6 tok/s61.8 tok/s
TTFT 1708ms1561ms
Latency 56417ms33925ms
Composite Indices
Intelligence 39.939.4
Coding 30.532.8
Math 82.7
Standard Benchmarks
GPQA 86.1%83.0%
MMLU Pro 87.5%
HLE 26.2%22.2%
LiveCodeBench 81.0%
MATH 500
AIME 2025 82.7%
AIME (Original)
SciCode 43.1%40.7%
LCR 66.0%59.0%
IFBench 70.7%69.9%
TAU-bench v2 83.6%85.4%
TerminalBench Hard 24.2%28.8%

Key Takeaways

MiniMax-M2.1 offers the best value at $0.30/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

Qwen3 Max Thinking leads in reasoning capabilities with a 86.1% GPQA, excelling at complex analytical tasks and problem-solving.

MiniMax-M2.1 reaches a 32.8 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.

When to Choose Each Model

Alibaba logo

Qwen3 Max Thinking

  • Complex reasoning tasks
  • Research & analysis
MiniMax logo

MiniMax-M2.1

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • High-volume processing
  • Code generation
  • Software development
EU Made in Europe

Chat with 100+ AI Models in one App.

Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, GLM-5, Kimi K2.5 and many more.

AI Model Comparison Guide

Compare large language models (LLMs) side-by-side with detailed benchmark scores, pricing, and performance metrics. Our interactive comparison tool helps you evaluate AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, DeepSeek, and other leading providers. Use our AI model leaderboard to discover more models to compare.

Understanding Composite Indices

  • Intelligence Index: Aggregated score combining MMLU-Pro, GPQA, and HLE benchmarks - measures overall reasoning and knowledge capabilities
  • Coding Index: Composite metric from LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and LiveCodeBench Review - evaluates programming proficiency across multiple languages
  • Math Index: Combined score from AIME, AIME 2025, and MATH-500 benchmarks - assesses mathematical reasoning from high school to competition level

Key Comparison Metrics

  • Benchmark Scores: Standardized tests measuring intelligence, coding, math, and specialized capabilities - higher percentages indicate better performance
  • Pricing Analysis: Compare input and output token costs across models - critical for budgeting API usage and scaling applications
  • Performance Metrics: Throughput (tokens/second) and latency measurements for real-time application planning
  • Context Windows: Maximum token capacity for processing documents and maintaining conversation history

How to Compare AI Models Effectively

Performance vs Cost

Balance benchmark scores against token pricing - flagship models offer 10-15% better performance but cost 5-10x more than smaller alternatives

Task-Specific Selection

Prioritize relevant indices: coding index for development tasks, math index for STEM applications, intelligence index for general reasoning

Real-World Testing

Use our free AI chat interface to test models with your specific prompts before committing to API integration

All benchmark scores, pricing data, and performance metrics are sourced from Artificial Analysis and updated daily. Compare models by intelligence, coding ability, math performance, speed, cost, or release date using our comprehensive AI model leaderboard.