Model Comparison
Reka Flash 3
vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Reka AI, Google
Recommended Pick
GoGemini 3.7 Flash (high)9 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, TTFT, Latency
Best Value
Reka Flash 3
100.0 value score
38.4 reasoning / $0.35/1M
Lowest Price
Reka Flash 3
$0.20/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
66.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
76.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Reka Flash 3 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Reka Flash 3 is 3.8x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.7 Flash (high).
Speed gap
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) generates about 5.4x as many tokens per second as Reka Flash 3.
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) leads Reka Flash 3 by 27.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) wins 9 measurable categories, including Throughput, TTFT, Latency, Reasoning.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Reka Flash 3
Reka AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Re Reka Flash 3 | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.75/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.80/1M | $3.75/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.35/1M | $1.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Reka AI | |
| Release Date | Mar 10, 2025 | Aug 13, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 95.7 tok/s | 515.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 84123ms | 6354ms |
| Latency | 105029ms | 6354ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 40.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 38.4 | 66.1 |
| Intelligence | 3.7 | 56.0 |
| Coding | — | 76.1 |
| Math | 33.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 52.9% | 94.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 66.9% | — |
| HLE | 4.4% | 47.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 43.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | 89.3% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 33.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 51.0% | — |
| SciCode | 26.7% | 56.8% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 80.0% |
| IFBench | 30.4% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 0.0% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.0% | — |
Key Takeaways
Reka Flash 3 offers the best value at $0.20/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 66.1 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) reaches a 76.1 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Reka Flash 3
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
