Agent skill
hr-talent
Quellcode ansehen: travisjneuman/.claude
Installation
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill hr-talent205
Installationen
EU-hosted inference API
Power your AI agent skills with open-source models.
Drop-in OpenAI-compatible API. No data leaves Europe.
MiniMax
MiniMax M3
$0.40 / $1.40
per M tokens
Z.ai
GLM 5.3 Flash
$0.20 / $0.60
per M tokens
MoonshotAI
Kimi K3
$4.00 / $18.00
per M tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 Pro
$1.80 / $3.60
per M tokens
HR & Talent Expert
Comprehensive HR frameworks for talent acquisition, performance management, and organizational development.
Talent Acquisition
Strategic Workforce Planning
WORKFORCE PLANNING PROCESS:
1. DEMAND ANALYSIS
- Business strategy alignment
- Headcount projections (growth, attrition, productivity)
- Skills gap analysis
- Scenario modeling
2. SUPPLY ANALYSIS
- Current workforce inventory
- Skills assessment
- Retirement projections
- Internal mobility potential
3. GAP ANALYSIS
- Quantity gaps (headcount)
- Quality gaps (skills, capabilities)
- Location gaps (geographic)
- Timeline gaps (when needed)
4. ACTION PLANNING
- Build (develop internally)
- Buy (external hiring)
- Borrow (contingent, partnerships)
- Bot (automation)Recruiting Metrics
| Metric | Formula | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Fill | Days from req open to offer accept | 30-45 days |
| Time to Hire | Days from first contact to start | 25-35 days |
| Cost per Hire | Total recruiting costs / Hires | $3,000-$5,000 |
| Quality of Hire | Performance + Retention + Time to Productivity | 80%+ |
| Offer Acceptance Rate | Offers accepted / Offers made | 85%+ |
| Source Effectiveness | Hires by source / Applications by source | Varies |
| Diversity Hiring | Diverse hires / Total hires | Target-based |
Interview Framework
STRUCTURED INTERVIEW DESIGN:
COMPETENCY-BASED:
- Define success profile
- Identify critical competencies
- Develop behavioral questions (STAR)
- Create scoring rubric
INTERVIEW SCORECARD:
| Competency | Weight | 1-5 Rating | Notes |
|------------|--------|------------|-------|
| Technical skills | 30% | | |
| Problem solving | 20% | | |
| Leadership | 20% | | |
| Culture fit | 15% | | |
| Communication | 15% | | |
STAR METHOD:
S - Situation: Context and background
T - Task: Responsibility and objective
A - Action: Steps taken personally
R - Result: Outcomes and learningsPerformance Management
Performance Framework
ANNUAL CYCLE:
Q1: Goal Setting
- Cascade from corporate objectives
- SMART goal creation
- Development goal inclusion
- Manager-employee alignment
Q2: Mid-Year Check-in
- Progress review
- Goal adjustment
- Feedback exchange
- Development discussion
Q3: Continuous Feedback
- Ongoing conversations
- Real-time recognition
- Course correction
- Skill development
Q4: Annual Review
- Performance assessment
- Calibration sessions
- Compensation decisions
- Development planningGoal Setting (OKR Framework)
OBJECTIVE: Qualitative description of what you want to achieve
- Inspirational
- Time-bound
- Action-oriented
KEY RESULTS: Quantitative measures of success
- Specific and measurable
- Aggressive but achievable
- Outcome-based (not task-based)
EXAMPLE:
Objective: Build a world-class engineering team
KR1: Increase eng hiring from 10 to 25/quarter
KR2: Improve offer acceptance rate from 70% to 85%
KR3: Reduce new hire 6-month attrition from 15% to 5%
KR4: Achieve 4.5/5.0 team engagement scorePerformance Calibration
| Rating | Distribution | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Exceptional | 5-10% | Consistently exceeds, role model |
| Exceeds | 20-25% | Above expectations, strong performer |
| Meets | 55-65% | Achieves expectations, solid contributor |
| Needs Improvement | 10-15% | Below expectations, support needed |
| Unsatisfactory | 0-5% | Significantly below, action required |
Compensation Strategy
Total Rewards Philosophy
COMPENSATION ELEMENTS:
BASE SALARY
- Market positioning (P25, P50, P75)
- Pay grades and ranges
- Geographic differentials
- Compression management
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE
- Annual bonus
- Performance metrics (corporate, business, individual)
- Target and maximum payouts
- Threshold requirements
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE
- Stock options
- Restricted stock units (RSUs)
- Performance shares
- Vesting schedules
BENEFITS
- Health and welfare
- Retirement (401k match, pension)
- Time off
- PerquisitesMarket Positioning Strategy
| Percentile | Philosophy | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| P75+ | Lead | Critical skills, war for talent |
| P50-P75 | Competitive | Key roles, retention focus |
| P50 | Market | Standard positions |
| P25-P50 | Lag | Offset by other rewards |
Pay Equity Analysis
ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK:
1. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
- Regression analysis controlling for:
- Job level/grade
- Performance rating
- Tenure
- Geography
- Education/credentials
2. COHORT ANALYSIS
- Same job, same location
- Compa-ratio comparisons
- Progression analysis
3. ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION
- Starting salary disparities
- Promotion rate differences
- Merit increase patterns
- Hire mix analysis
4. REMEDIATION
- Adjustment budgets
- Process improvements
- Policy changes
- Monitoring systemsOrganizational Design
Organization Structure Models
| Structure | Best For | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Stable, efficiency-focused | Expertise, efficiency | Silos, slow decisions |
| Divisional | Diverse products/markets | Accountability, responsiveness | Duplication, competition |
| Matrix | Complex, multiple priorities | Flexibility, resource sharing | Conflict, complexity |
| Flat | Innovation, speed | Agility, empowerment | Scale limitations |
| Network | Partnerships, outsourcing | Flexibility, cost | Control, coordination |
Span of Control Guidelines
| Level | Typical Span | Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Executive | 5-8 direct reports | Complexity, strategy time |
| Director | 6-10 direct reports | Team maturity, role complexity |
| Manager | 8-15 direct reports | Task similarity, systems |
| Supervisor | 15-25+ direct reports | Routine work, clear processes |
Role Design (RACI Matrix)
R - Responsible: Does the work
A - Accountable: Final decision authority
C - Consulted: Provides input
I - Informed: Kept updated
| Activity | Role A | Role B | Role C | Role D |
|----------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Task 1 | A | R | C | I |
| Task 2 | A/R | C | | I |
| Task 3 | A | R | R | C |Culture & Engagement
Culture Framework
CULTURE ELEMENTS:
VALUES: Core beliefs guiding behavior
- What we stand for
- How we make decisions
- What we reward and recognize
NORMS: Unwritten rules of behavior
- How we communicate
- How we collaborate
- How we handle conflict
SYMBOLS: Visible representations
- Physical space design
- Dress code
- Rituals and ceremonies
PRACTICES: How work gets done
- Meeting culture
- Decision-making processes
- Recognition programsEmployee Engagement Survey
| Category | Sample Questions | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement | "I would recommend this company" | 80%+ |
| Purpose | "My work makes a difference" | 85%+ |
| Development | "I have growth opportunities" | 70%+ |
| Manager | "My manager supports me" | 80%+ |
| Recognition | "I feel valued for my contributions" | 75%+ |
| Wellbeing | "I can maintain work-life balance" | 70%+ |
eNPS (Employee Net Promoter Score)
CALCULATION:
eNPS = % Promoters (9-10) - % Detractors (0-6)
SCORING:
70+ Excellent
50-69 Great
30-49 Good
10-29 Average
<10 Needs Work
ACTION PLANNING:
- Segment by team, location, tenure
- Identify drivers through comments
- Create targeted improvement plans
- Close the loop with employeesSuccession Planning
Succession Framework
9-BOX ASSESSMENT:
PERFORMANCE
Low Medium High
POTENTIAL High Enigma Rising High
Star Potential
Medium Under Core High
Performer Performer Performer
Low Poor Effective Solid
Fit Performer PerformerSuccession Planning Process
1. IDENTIFY CRITICAL ROLES
- Business impact
- Difficulty to fill
- Single points of failure
- Strategic importance
2. ASSESS TALENT
- Current performance
- Future potential
- Readiness timeline
- Risk of departure
3. DEVELOP SUCCESSORS
- Individual development plans
- Stretch assignments
- Mentoring/coaching
- Formal training
4. REVIEW AND UPDATE
- Annual talent reviews
- Emergency succession
- Pipeline health metricsReadiness Assessment
| Timeline | Characteristics | Development Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Ready Now | Can perform immediately | Retention, engagement |
| Ready 1-2 Years | Needs minor development | Targeted experiences |
| Ready 3-5 Years | High potential, gaps exist | Accelerated development |
| Long-term | Early career potential | Foundational development |
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
DEI Strategy Framework
DIMENSIONS OF DIVERSITY:
- Identity: Race, gender, age, disability, LGBTQ+
- Experience: Background, education, industry
- Cognitive: Thinking styles, perspectives
EQUITY FOCUS AREAS:
- Hiring practices
- Promotion rates
- Compensation parity
- Access to opportunities
- Voice and representation
INCLUSION INDICATORS:
- Belonging scores
- Retention by demographic
- Participation rates
- Psychological safetyDEI Metrics Dashboard
| Metric | Measurement | Cadence |
|---|---|---|
| Representation | % by demographic across levels | Quarterly |
| Hiring | Application, interview, offer by demographic | Monthly |
| Promotion | Promotion rate by demographic | Annual |
| Retention | Turnover by demographic | Quarterly |
| Pay Equity | Adjusted pay gaps | Annual |
| Inclusion | Survey scores by demographic | Semi-annual |
Inclusive Hiring Practices
BIAS REDUCTION:
- [ ] Diverse interview panels
- [ ] Structured interviews
- [ ] Skills-based assessments
- [ ] Blind resume review
- [ ] Diverse candidate slates
- [ ] Inclusive job descriptions
- [ ] Equitable sourcing
- [ ] Interview trainingHR Analytics
Key HR Metrics
| Category | Metric | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover | Voluntary Turnover | Voluntary terms / Avg headcount |
| Regrettable Turnover | High performer terms / High performers | |
| First Year Turnover | <1 yr terms / New hires | |
| Retention | Retention Rate | (Start HC - Terms) / Start HC |
| Engagement | eNPS | Promoters% - Detractors% |
| Development | Internal Fill Rate | Internal hires / Total hires |
| Productivity | Revenue per Employee | Revenue / FTE |
| Cost | HR Cost per Employee | Total HR cost / FTE |
See Also
Installationen
Sicherheitsprüfung
Quellcode ansehen
travisjneuman/.claude
Mehr aus dieser Quelle
Give agents clean web context
Search and extract the public web as Markdown or structured JSON through one API or hosted MCP server.
Verwandte Skills
Mehr aus dieser Quelle: travisjneuman/.claude
So verwenden Sie diesen Skill
Install hr-talent by running npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill hr-talent in your project directory. Führen Sie den obigen Installationsbefehl in Ihrem Projektverzeichnis aus. Die Skill-Datei wird von GitHub heruntergeladen und in Ihrem Projekt platziert.
Keine Konfiguration erforderlich. Ihr KI-Agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf usw.) erkennt installierte Skills automatisch und nutzt sie als Kontext bei der Code-Generierung.
Der Skill verbessert das Verständnis Ihres Agenten für hr-talent, und hilft ihm, etablierte Muster zu befolgen, häufige Fehler zu vermeiden und produktionsreifen Code zu erzeugen.
Was Sie erhalten
Skills sind Klartext-Anweisungsdateien — kein ausführbarer Code. Sie kodieren Expertenwissen über Frameworks, Sprachen oder Tools, das Ihr KI-Agent liest, um seine Ausgabe zu verbessern. Das bedeutet null Laufzeit-Overhead, keine Abhängigkeitskonflikte und volle Transparenz: Sie können jede Anweisung vor der Installation lesen und prüfen.
Kompatibilität
Dieser Skill funktioniert mit jedem KI-Coding-Agenten, der das skills.sh-Format unterstützt, einschließlich Claude Code (Anthropic), Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, Aider und anderen Tools, die projektbezogene Kontextdateien lesen. Skills sind auf Transportebene framework-agnostisch — der Inhalt bestimmt, für welche Sprache oder welches Framework er gilt.