Agent skill
operations
Quellcode ansehen: travisjneuman/.claude
Installation
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill operations153
Installationen
EU-hosted inference API
Power your AI agent skills with open-source models.
Drop-in OpenAI-compatible API. No data leaves Europe.
MiniMax
MiniMax M3
$0.50 / $1.90
per M tokens
Z.ai
GLM 5.3 Flash
$0.20 / $0.60
per M tokens
MoonshotAI
Kimi K3
$4.00 / $18.00
per M tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
$0.40 / $1.42
per M tokens
Operations Expert
Comprehensive operations frameworks for process improvement, supply chain management, and operational excellence.
Operational Excellence Frameworks
Lean Manufacturing Principles
THE 5 PRINCIPLES OF LEAN:
1. Value - Define from customer perspective
2. Value Stream - Map all steps, eliminate waste
3. Flow - Make value-creating steps flow smoothly
4. Pull - Let customer demand drive production
5. Perfection - Continuously improve toward perfection8 Wastes (DOWNTIME)
| Waste | Definition | Examples | Countermeasures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defects | Work requiring rework/scrap | Quality issues, errors | Poka-yoke, quality at source |
| Overproduction | Making more than needed | Excess inventory, WIP | Pull systems, kanban |
| Waiting | Idle time between processes | Queue time, approvals | Flow optimization, cross-training |
| Non-utilized talent | Underusing employee skills | Manual data entry, routine tasks | Empowerment, automation |
| Transportation | Unnecessary movement of materials | Multiple handling, poor layout | Facility layout optimization |
| Inventory | Excess stock/materials | Safety stock, WIP | JIT, demand planning |
| Motion | Unnecessary worker movement | Poor workstation design | 5S, ergonomics |
| Extra processing | More work than required | Over-engineering, redundant checks | Value stream mapping |
Six Sigma DMAIC
DEFINE
- Problem statement
- Project charter
- Voice of customer (VOC)
- SIPOC diagram
- CTQ (Critical to Quality) tree
MEASURE
- Data collection plan
- Process capability (Cp, Cpk)
- Measurement system analysis
- Baseline metrics
ANALYZE
- Root cause analysis (5 Whys, Fishbone)
- Statistical analysis
- Process mapping
- Hypothesis testing
IMPROVE
- Solution generation
- Pilot testing
- Implementation plan
- Risk assessment (FMEA)
CONTROL
- Control plan
- Statistical process control (SPC)
- Standard operating procedures
- Training and handoffSix Sigma Metrics
| Sigma Level | DPMO | Yield |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 691,462 | 30.9% |
| 2 | 308,538 | 69.1% |
| 3 | 66,807 | 93.3% |
| 4 | 6,210 | 99.4% |
| 5 | 233 | 99.98% |
| 6 | 3.4 | 99.9997% |
Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain Strategy
| Strategy | When to Use | Key Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Efficient | Stable demand, commodity products | Low cost, high utilization, minimal inventory |
| Responsive | Unpredictable demand, innovative products | Speed, flexibility, buffer inventory |
| Risk-Hedging | Supply uncertainty | Multiple suppliers, pooled inventory |
| Agile | Demand and supply uncertainty | All above combined, modular design |
SCOR Model (Supply Chain Operations Reference)
PLAN
- Demand planning
- Supply planning
- S&OP process
- Inventory planning
SOURCE
- Supplier selection
- Contract negotiation
- Procurement
- Supplier performance
MAKE
- Production scheduling
- Manufacturing execution
- Quality management
- Capacity management
DELIVER
- Order management
- Warehousing
- Transportation
- Last-mile delivery
RETURN
- Reverse logistics
- Returns processing
- Warranty management
- Disposal/recycling
ENABLE
- Business rules
- Performance management
- Data management
- Risk managementSupply Chain KPIs
| Category | Metric | Formula | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | Perfect Order | (Complete, On-time, Damage-free, Accurate docs) / Total | 95%+ |
| OTIF | Orders On-Time In-Full / Total Orders | 98%+ | |
| Responsiveness | Order Cycle Time | Order receipt to delivery | Industry specific |
| Lead Time | Request to fulfillment | Minimize | |
| Agility | Upside Flexibility | % increase possible in 30 days | 20%+ |
| Supply Chain Adaptability | Time to adjust to market change | Minimize | |
| Cost | Supply Chain Cost | Total SC cost / Revenue | 5-10% |
| COGS | Cost of Goods Sold / Revenue | Industry specific | |
| Asset Management | Cash-to-Cash | DIO + DSO - DPO | Industry specific |
| Inventory Turns | COGS / Average Inventory | Higher is better |
Demand Planning & Forecasting
Forecasting Methods
| Method | Use Case | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| Moving Average | Stable demand | Low-Medium |
| Exponential Smoothing | Trend data | Medium |
| Regression | Causal relationships | Medium-High |
| ARIMA | Complex patterns | High |
| Machine Learning | Large datasets, many variables | High |
| Collaborative | Retail, promotions | Medium-High |
S&OP (Sales & Operations Planning)
MONTHLY S&OP CYCLE:
Week 1: Data Gathering
- Update sales forecast
- Review actual vs. plan
- Identify issues
Week 2: Demand Planning
- Demand review meeting
- Consensus forecast
- New product planning
Week 3: Supply Planning
- Capacity analysis
- Inventory planning
- Resource requirements
Week 4: Pre-S&OP
- Gap analysis
- Scenario planning
- Financial reconciliation
Week 5: Executive S&OP
- Final decisions
- Resource allocation
- Performance reviewInventory Management
| Model | Formula | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| EOQ | √(2DS/H) | Constant demand |
| Safety Stock | z × σ × √LT | Buffer uncertainty |
| Reorder Point | (D × LT) + SS | Trigger replenishment |
ABC CLASSIFICATION:
A Items: 20% of SKUs, 80% of value → Tight control
B Items: 30% of SKUs, 15% of value → Moderate control
C Items: 50% of SKUs, 5% of value → Minimal control
XYZ CLASSIFICATION (Variability):
X: Low variability (CV < 0.5) → Predictable
Y: Medium variability (0.5 < CV < 1.0) → Some variation
Z: High variability (CV > 1.0) → SporadicQuality Management
Total Quality Management (TQM)
TQM PRINCIPLES:
1. Customer focus
2. Total employee involvement
3. Process-centered
4. Integrated system
5. Strategic and systematic approach
6. Continuous improvement
7. Fact-based decision making
8. CommunicationsQuality Tools
| Tool | Purpose | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Pareto Chart | Identify vital few | Prioritizing problems |
| Fishbone Diagram | Root cause analysis | Problem investigation |
| Control Charts | Monitor process stability | Ongoing monitoring |
| Histogram | Show distribution | Understanding variation |
| Scatter Diagram | Show correlation | Relationship analysis |
| Check Sheet | Data collection | Systematic recording |
| Flowchart | Visualize process | Process understanding |
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
CONTROL CHART RULES (Western Electric):
Rule 1: One point beyond 3σ
Rule 2: 2 of 3 points beyond 2σ (same side)
Rule 3: 4 of 5 points beyond 1σ (same side)
Rule 4: 8 points in a row on one side of center
Rule 5: 6 points trending up or down
Rule 6: 14 points alternating up and down
Rule 7: 15 points within 1σ (reduced variation)
Rule 8: 8 points beyond 1σ (both sides)Capacity Planning
Capacity Analysis
CAPACITY METRICS:
Design Capacity: Maximum theoretical output
Effective Capacity: Expected output given constraints
Actual Output: Real production achieved
Utilization = Actual Output / Design Capacity
Efficiency = Actual Output / Effective Capacity
CAPACITY STRATEGIES:
Lead: Build capacity ahead of demand
Lag: Build capacity after demand materializes
Match: Incrementally match demandProduction Planning
| Planning Level | Horizon | Decisions |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic | 1-5 years | Facilities, major equipment |
| Tactical | 3-18 months | Workforce, inventory levels |
| Operational | Days-weeks | Scheduling, sequencing |
Vendor Management
Supplier Evaluation Criteria
QCDDM FRAMEWORK:
Q - Quality (PPM, certification, capability)
C - Cost (Price, TCO, cost reduction)
D - Delivery (OTIF, lead time, flexibility)
D - Development (Innovation, collaboration)
M - Management (Financial stability, risk)
SCORECARD WEIGHTS (example):
Quality: 30%
Delivery: 25%
Cost: 25%
Service: 10%
Innovation: 10%Supplier Relationship Tiers
| Tier | Relationship | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic | Partnership | Joint development, long-term, shared risk |
| Preferred | Collaboration | Volume commitment, improvement programs |
| Approved | Transactional | Competitive bidding, standard terms |
| Spot | One-time | Emergency purchases, minimal vetting |
Contract Management
KEY CONTRACT ELEMENTS:
- Scope of work / specifications
- Pricing structure (fixed, cost-plus, tiered)
- Volume commitments
- Quality requirements and remedies
- Delivery terms (Incoterms)
- IP ownership
- Liability and indemnification
- Force majeure
- Termination rights
- Performance metrics / SLAs
- Dispute resolutionProcess Improvement Methodology
Value Stream Mapping
CURRENT STATE MAP:
1. Identify product family
2. Map customer requirements
3. Walk the process
4. Collect data (cycle time, changeover, uptime)
5. Calculate lead time vs. process time
6. Identify waste
FUTURE STATE MAP:
1. Calculate takt time
2. Implement continuous flow where possible
3. Use pull systems
4. Level production
5. Identify kaizen bursts
6. Calculate new lead timeKaizen Events
| Phase | Duration | Activities |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation | 2-4 weeks | Scope, team, data gathering |
| Event | 3-5 days | Analysis, solution design, implementation |
| Follow-up | 30-60 days | Sustain, measure, adjust |
5S Methodology
| Step | Japanese | English | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seiri | Sort | Remove unnecessary items |
| 2 | Seiton | Set in Order | Organize remaining items |
| 3 | Seiso | Shine | Clean work area |
| 4 | Seiketsu | Standardize | Create standards |
| 5 | Shitsuke | Sustain | Maintain discipline |
Operational Metrics Dashboard
Key Operating Metrics
| Category | Metric | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | TRIR, Lost Time | Daily |
| Quality | First Pass Yield, Defect Rate | Daily |
| Delivery | OTIF, Lead Time | Daily |
| Cost | Unit Cost, Productivity | Weekly |
| Inventory | Turns, DOS | Weekly |
| Equipment | OEE, Downtime | Daily |
OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness)
OEE = Availability × Performance × Quality
Availability = Run Time / Planned Production Time
Performance = (Total Count × Ideal Cycle Time) / Run Time
Quality = Good Count / Total Count
WORLD-CLASS OEE: 85%+
- Availability: 90%
- Performance: 95%
- Quality: 99%See Also
Verwandte Skills
Mehr aus dieser Quelle: travisjneuman/.claude
So verwenden Sie diesen Skill
- 1
Install operations by running
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill operationsin your project directory. Führen Sie den obigen Installationsbefehl in Ihrem Projektverzeichnis aus. Die Skill-Datei wird von GitHub heruntergeladen und in Ihrem Projekt platziert. - 2
Keine Konfiguration erforderlich. Ihr KI-Agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf usw.) erkennt installierte Skills automatisch und nutzt sie als Kontext bei der Code-Generierung.
- 3
Der Skill verbessert das Verständnis Ihres Agenten für operations, und hilft ihm, etablierte Muster zu befolgen, häufige Fehler zu vermeiden und produktionsreifen Code zu erzeugen.
Was Sie erhalten
Skills sind Klartext-Anweisungsdateien — kein ausführbarer Code. Sie kodieren Expertenwissen über Frameworks, Sprachen oder Tools, das Ihr KI-Agent liest, um seine Ausgabe zu verbessern. Das bedeutet null Laufzeit-Overhead, keine Abhängigkeitskonflikte und volle Transparenz: Sie können jede Anweisung vor der Installation lesen und prüfen.
Kompatibilität
Dieser Skill funktioniert mit jedem KI-Coding-Agenten, der das skills.sh-Format unterstützt, einschließlich Claude Code (Anthropic), Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, Aider und anderen Tools, die projektbezogene Kontextdateien lesen. Skills sind auf Transportebene framework-agnostisch — der Inhalt bestimmt, für welche Sprache oder welches Framework er gilt.
Data sourced from the skills.sh registry and GitHub. Install counts and security audits are updated regularly.