Model Comparison

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta
vs. Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Sapiens AI, Anthropic

Recommended Pick

Sapiens AI logoAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta7 metric wins

Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price

Best Value

Sapiens AI logo

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta

100.0 value score

49.1 reasoning / $0.15/1M

Lowest Price

Sapiens AI logo

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta

$0.10/1M input price

Best Reasoning

Anthropic logo

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

63.1 reasoning score

Blends available reasoning benchmarks

Best for Coding

Anthropic logo

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

78.0 coding index

Differences That Matter

Best value

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.

Price gap

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta is 50x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort).

Speed gap

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta generates about 2.9x as many tokens per second as Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort).

Reasoning gap

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) leads Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 14.0 points on reasoning.

Coding gap

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) leads Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 15.7 points on coding.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h
Sapiens AI logo

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta

Sapiens AI

Waiting

TTFT

Time

tok/s

Tokens

Cost

Waiting
Anthropic logo

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

Anthropic

Waiting

TTFT

Time

tok/s

Tokens

Cost

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Chat with leading AI models

Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.

EU-hosted inference

Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.

Full Comparison

Metric
Top Pick
Sapiens AI logoAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta
Sapiens AI
Anthropic logoClaude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Anthropic
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost$0.10/1M$5.00/1M
Output Cost$0.30/1M$25.00/1M
Blended (3:1)$0.15/1M$10.00/1M
Specifications
OrganizationSapiens AIAnthropic
Release DateAug 26, 2026Jul 24, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput159.3 tok/s55.4 tok/s
TTFT2450ms42910ms
Latency15010ms42910ms
Composite Indices
Value Score100.01.9
Reasoning Score49.163.1
Intelligence49.163.1
Coding62.378.0

Key Takeaways

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta offers the best value at $0.10/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 63.1 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) reaches a 78.0 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.

When to Choose Each Model

Sapiens AI logo

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • High-volume processing
Anthropic logo

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

  • Complex reasoning tasks
  • Research & analysis
  • Code generation
  • Software development