Model Comparison
Agnes 3.0 Flash
vs. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Sapiens AI, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Agnes 3.0 Flash
100.0 value score
35.5 reasoning / $0.08/1M
Lowest Price
Agnes 3.0 Flash
$0.05/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
53.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
80.7 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Agnes 3.0 Flash has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Agnes 3.0 Flash is 200x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback).
Speed gap
Agnes 3.0 Flash generates about 4.2x as many tokens per second as Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback).
Reasoning gap
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) leads Agnes 3.0 Flash by 17.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Agnes 3.0 Flash wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Agnes 3.0 Flash
Sapiens AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Sa Agnes 3.0 Flash | An Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.05/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.15/1M | $50.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.08/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Sapiens AI | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Sep 11, 2026 | Sep 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 252.7 tok/s | 59.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1930ms | 102800ms |
| Latency | 9840ms | 102800ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 0.6 |
| Reasoning Score | 35.5 | 53.2 |
| Intelligence | 35.5 | 53.2 |
| Coding | — | 80.7 |
Key Takeaways
Agnes 3.0 Flash offers the best value at $0.05/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.2 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) reaches a 80.7 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Agnes 3.0 Flash
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
