AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)

Most Intelligent AI Models

Language models ranked by Artificial Analysis Index

Model
AI model name and provider organization
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - composite reasoning and capability score across the benchmark suite
Value Score
Quality, speed, and blended token price combined into a relative value score
Speed
Inference throughput in tokens per second - how fast the model generates responses
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#1 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jul 24, 2026
63.11053 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)
#2 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jul 24, 2026
62.51051 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
#3 Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
by Anthropic Β· Jun 9, 2026
62.1767 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)
#4 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jul 24, 2026
61.51050 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
#5 GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
60.9965 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K3 (max)
#6 K3 (max)
by Kimi Β· Jul 16, 2026
59.71340 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)
#7 GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
59.0958 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort)
#8 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jul 24, 2026
58.61049 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.8 Max
#9 Qwen3.8 Max
by Alibaba Β· Aug 3, 2026
58.11850 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (high)
#10 GPT-5.6 Sol (high)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
57.3957 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#11 Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· May 28, 2026
57.39N/A
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh)
#12 Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh)
by Meta Β· Aug 5, 2026
56.821N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (max)
#13 GPT-5.6 Terra (max)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
56.622120 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
#14 GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
56.39N/A
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.5 (high)
#15 Grok 4.5 (high)
by SpaceXAI Β· Jul 8, 2026
55.81751 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
#16 GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
55.6952 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#17 Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jun 30, 2026
55.31684 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#18 Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Apr 16, 2026
55.09N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (high)
#19 GPT-5.5 (high)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
54.79N/A
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
#20 Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
by Meta Β· Jul 9, 2026
53.220N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 (xhigh)
#21 GPT-5.4 (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 5, 2026
53.112N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
#22 GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
52.818104 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.2 (max)
#23 GLM-5.2 (max)
by Z AI Β· Jun 16, 2026
52.631125 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)
#24 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jul 24, 2026
52.5949 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
#25 GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
52.368162 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
#26 Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
by Google Β· May 19, 2026
52.015N/A
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#27 V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Jul 31, 2026
51.8100116 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)
#28 Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)
by Google Β· Jul 21, 2026
51.626220 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (medium)
#29 GPT-5.5 (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
51.48N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (low)
#30 GPT-5.6 Sol (low)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
50.7852 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
#31 GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
50.11589 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)
#32 GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
50.165147 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#33 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 17, 2026
48.410N/A
Kimi AI provider logo - K3 (low)
#34 K3 (low)
by Kimi Β· Jul 16, 2026
48.31038 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
#35 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
by Google Β· Feb 19, 2026
47.720126 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (high)
#36 GPT-5.6 Luna (high)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
47.061148 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)
#37 GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
46.81488 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium)
#38 Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium)
by Google Β· May 19, 2026
46.722252 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.7 Max
#39 Qwen3.7 Max
by Alibaba Β· May 19, 2026
46.713N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)
#40 GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Feb 5, 2026
45.517119 tok/s
MiniMax AI provider logo - M3
#41 M3
by MiniMax Β· Jun 1, 2026
45.44295 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#42 V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
45.33264 tok/s
Motif Technologies AI provider logo - Motif 3 (Beta)
#43 Motif 3 (Beta)
by Motif Technologies Β· Jul 14, 2026
45.3N/AN/A
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.6
#44 K2.6
by Kimi Β· Apr 20, 2026
45.118N/A
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#45 Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 5, 2026
44.97N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (low)
#46 GPT-5.5 (low)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
44.57N/A
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark
#47 Muse Spark
by Meta Β· Apr 8, 2026
44.3N/AN/A
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#48 Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Apr 16, 2026
43.97N/A
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
#49 V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
43.73161 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.2 (xhigh)
#50 GPT-5.2 (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Dec 11, 2025
43.310N/A
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.7 Code
#51 K2.7 Code
by Kimi Β· Jun 12, 2026
43.01740 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2.5-Pro
#52 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
by Xiaomi Β· Apr 22, 2026
42.93051 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#53 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jun 30, 2026
42.61159 tok/s
Thinking Machines AI provider logo - Inkling (xhigh)
#54 Inkling (xhigh)
by Thinking Machines Β· Jul 15, 2026
42.31775 tok/s
Tencent AI provider logo - Hy3
#55 Hy3
by Tencent Β· Jul 6, 2026
42.24565 tok/s
Nex AGI AI provider logo - Nex-N2-Pro
#56 Nex-N2-Pro
by Nex AGI Β· Jun 2, 2026
42.137142 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#57 V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
42.154N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
#58 GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
41.9754 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
#59 Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· Nov 24, 2025
41.97N/A
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2-Pro
#60 MiMo-V2-Pro
by Xiaomi Β· Mar 18, 2026
41.4N/AN/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (low)
#61 GPT-5.6 Terra (low)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
41.31182 tok/s
Thinking Machines AI provider logo - Inkling Small
#62 Inkling Small
by Thinking Machines Β· Jul 30, 2026
41.250125 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh)
#63 GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Dec 11, 2025
41.210N/A
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 Max Preview
#64 Qwen3.6 Max Preview
by Alibaba Β· Apr 20, 2026
41.113N/A
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
#65 GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Apr 7, 2026
41.015N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh)
#66 GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 17, 2026
40.916N/A
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok Build 0.1 0616
#67 Grok Build 0.1 0616
by SpaceXAI Β· Jun 16, 2026
40.719N/A
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
#68 Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
by Google Β· Nov 18, 2025
40.610N/A
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5 (Reasoning)
#69 GLM-5 (Reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Feb 11, 2026
40.617N/A
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 Plus
#70 Qwen3.6 Plus
by Alibaba Β· Apr 2, 2026
40.520N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 (low)
#71 GPT-5.4 (low)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 5, 2026
40.29N/A
China Mobile AI provider logo - JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
#72 JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
by China Mobile Β· Jul 9, 2026
39.9N/AN/A
Sapiens AI AI provider logo - Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha
#73 Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha
by Sapiens AI Β· Jul 24, 2026
39.746131 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
#74 GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 17, 2026
39.731N/A
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.7 Plus
#75 Qwen3.7 Plus
by Alibaba Β· Jun 1, 2026
39.42555 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5-Turbo
#76 GLM-5-Turbo
by Z AI Β· Mar 15, 2026
39.1N/AN/A
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort)
#77 V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
39.049N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
#78 GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
38.951147 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.2 (medium)
#79 GPT-5.2 (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Dec 11, 2025
38.99N/A
MiniMax AI provider logo - M2.7
#80 M2.7
by MiniMax Β· Mar 18, 2026
38.928N/A
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#81 Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 5, 2026
38.86N/A
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)
#82 Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)
by Google Β· Dec 17, 2025
38.719N/A
NVIDIA AI provider logo - Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
#83 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
by NVIDIA Β· Jun 4, 2026
38.331122 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2.5
#84 MiMo-V2.5
by Xiaomi Β· Apr 22, 2026
38.04977 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.20 0309 v2 (Reasoning)
#85 Grok 4.20 0309 v2 (Reasoning)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 7, 2026
38.016N/A
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.3 (high)
#86 Grok 4.3 (high)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026
37.916N/A
InclusionAI AI provider logo - Ling 3.0 Flash
#87 Ling 3.0 Flash
by InclusionAI Β· Aug 4, 2026
37.899386 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
#88 Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Apr 22, 2026
37.71757 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.1 (high)
#89 GPT-5.1 (high)
by OpenAI Β· Nov 13, 2025
37.511N/A
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
#90 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
by Google Β· Jul 21, 2026
37.435343 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)
#91 Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· Sep 29, 2025
37.48N/A
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning)
#92 Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning)
by SpaceXAI Β· Mar 10, 2026
37.411N/A
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2-Omni-0327
#93 MiMo-V2-Omni-0327
by Xiaomi Β· Mar 27, 2026
37.3N/AN/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5 Codex (high)
#94 GPT-5 Codex (high)
by OpenAI Β· Sep 23, 2025
37.010N/A
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.3 (medium)
#95 Grok 4.3 (medium)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026
36.925122 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#96 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 17, 2026
36.88N/A
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.3 (low)
#97 Grok 4.3 (low)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026
36.322109 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)
#98 GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Apr 7, 2026
36.313N/A
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.5 (Reasoning)
#99 K2.5 (Reasoning)
by Kimi Β· Jan 27, 2026
36.017N/A
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2-Omni
#100 MiMo-V2-Omni
by Xiaomi Β· Mar 19, 2026
35.9N/AN/A

Showing 100 of 596 models

Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard

This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.

Core AI Benchmarks Explained

MMLU-ProTests broad knowledge across 14 academic subjects
GPQAPhD-level reasoning & problem-solving
AIME 2025Elite mathematical reasoning
Coding IndexLiveCodeBench + SciCode composite
Math IndexAIME + MATH-500 composite

Key Metrics to Consider

Token PricingInput vs output cost per 1M tokens
Inference SpeedTokens/sec for response time
Release DateLatest techniques & knowledge
Benchmark Scores0-100% capability comparison

How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case

For Research & Analysis

Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation

For Cost Optimization

Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks

For Math & STEM

Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications

All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?

MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.

What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?

GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.

What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?

AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.

How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?

AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.

Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?

Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.

How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?

Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.

What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?

Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.

Can I test these AI models for free before committing?

Yes! Try our free AI chat interface to test different models instantly without creating an account. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.