AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)

Best AI Coding Models

Language models ranked by Artificial Analysis Index

Model
AI model name and provider organization
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - composite reasoning and capability score across the benchmark suite
Value Score
Quality, speed, and blended token price combined into a relative value score
Speed
Inference throughput in tokens per second - how fast the model generates responses
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)
#1 GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
57.71265 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
#2 GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
58.91267 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (high)
#3 GPT-5.6 Sol (high)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
55.91157 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (max)
#4 GPT-5.6 Terra (max)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
55.026157 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
#5 Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
by Anthropic Β· Jun 9, 2026
59.9970 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
#6 GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
53.61160 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K3
#7 K3
by Kimi Β· Jul 16, 2026
57.11638 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
#8 GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
54.81390 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#9 Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· May 28, 2026
55.71263 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#10 Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Apr 16, 2026
53.51161 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.5 (high)
#11 Grok 4.5 (high)
by SpaceXAI Β· Jul 8, 2026
53.82277 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (high)
#12 GPT-5.5 (high)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
53.11177 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#13 Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jun 30, 2026
53.42188 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (medium)
#14 GPT-5.5 (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
50.41076 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
#15 GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
51.238203 tok/s
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
#16 Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
by Meta Β· Jul 9, 2026
50.639122 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 (xhigh)
#17 GPT-5.4 (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 5, 2026
51.424152 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
#18 GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
51.625131 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
#19 Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
by Google Β· May 19, 2026
50.231287 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (low)
#20 GPT-5.6 Sol (low)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
49.41056 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)
#21 Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)
by Google Β· Jul 21, 2026
50.133311 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
#22 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
by Google Β· Feb 19, 2026
46.525136 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.2 (max)
#23 GLM-5.2 (max)
by Z AI Β· Jun 16, 2026
51.139196 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)
#24 GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
49.137197 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
#25 GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
49.023131 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#26 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jun 30, 2026
41.71461 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.7 Max
#27 Qwen3.7 Max
by Alibaba Β· May 19, 2026
46.027207 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
#28 GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
41.2855 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)
#29 GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
45.620118 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (high)
#30 GPT-5.6 Luna (high)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
46.135199 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#31 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 17, 2026
47.21372 tok/s
Motif Technologies AI provider logo - Motif 3 (Beta)
#32 Motif 3 (Beta)
by Motif Technologies Β· N/A
44.1N/AN/A
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.6
#33 K2.6
by Kimi Β· Apr 20, 2026
44.22356 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (low)
#34 GPT-5.5 (low)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
43.5976 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.7 Code
#35 K2.7 Code
by Kimi Β· Jun 12, 2026
41.92247 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2.5-Pro
#36 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
by Xiaomi Β· Apr 22, 2026
42.23958 tok/s
KwaiKAT AI provider logo - KAT Coder Pro V2
#37 KAT Coder Pro V2
by KwaiKAT Β· Mar 27, 2026
33.731N/A
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#38 V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
44.34173 tok/s
Nex AGI AI provider logo - Nex-N2-Pro
#39 Nex-N2-Pro
by Nex AGI Β· Jun 2, 2026
41.046136 tok/s
Tencent AI provider logo - Hy3
#40 Hy3
by Tencent Β· Jul 6, 2026
41.2N/A60 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
#41 V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
43.14068 tok/s
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark
#42 Muse Spark
by Meta Β· Apr 8, 2026
43.1N/AN/A
MiniMax AI provider logo - M3
#43 M3
by MiniMax Β· Jun 1, 2026
44.45497 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (low)
#44 GPT-5.6 Terra (low)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
40.519123 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2.5
#45 MiMo-V2.5
by Xiaomi Β· Apr 22, 2026
37.26064 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)
#46 GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
35.4775 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#47 V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
40.3100115 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh)
#48 GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 17, 2026
40.035180 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
#49 GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 17, 2026
38.263163 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.7 Plus
#50 Qwen3.7 Plus
by Alibaba Β· Jun 1, 2026
39.03253 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
#51 GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Apr 7, 2026
40.22184 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 Plus
#52 Qwen3.6 Plus
by Alibaba Β· Apr 2, 2026
39.62553 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
#53 Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Apr 22, 2026
37.12260 tok/s
MiniMax AI provider logo - M2.7
#54 M2.7
by MiniMax Β· Mar 18, 2026
38.13659 tok/s
China Mobile AI provider logo - JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
#55 JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
by China Mobile Β· Jul 9, 2026
38.8N/AN/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
#56 GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
34.015118 tok/s
Thinking Machines AI provider logo - Inkling (xhigh)
#57 Inkling (xhigh)
by Thinking Machines Β· Jul 15, 2026
40.717N/A
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)
#58 Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· Sep 29, 2025
36.41067 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort)
#59 V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
37.561N/A
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok Build 0.1 0616
#60 Grok Build 0.1 0616
by SpaceXAI Β· Jun 16, 2026
39.82456 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
#61 GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
38.129182 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)
#62 MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)
by Xiaomi Β· Dec 16, 2025
24.7N/AN/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.1 (high)
#63 GPT-5.1 (high)
by OpenAI Β· Nov 13, 2025
36.920110 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
#64 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
by Google Β· Jul 21, 2026
36.545600 tok/s
NVIDIA AI provider logo - Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
#65 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
by NVIDIA Β· Jun 4, 2026
37.839215 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
#66 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Feb 16, 2026
33.72061 tok/s
Mistral AI provider logo - Medium 3.5
#67 Medium 3.5
by Mistral Β· Apr 29, 2026
29.919135 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.5 (Reasoning)
#68 K2.5 (Reasoning)
by Kimi Β· Jan 27, 2026
35.42250 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25)
#69 Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25)
by Google Β· Mar 25, 2025
23.0N/AN/A
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
#70 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Apr 22, 2026
30.51860 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
#71 GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Jun 16, 2026
34.123112 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
#72 GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Sep 30, 2025
28.72046 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
#73 Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Feb 24, 2026
32.335140 tok/s
LongCat AI provider logo - 2.0
#74 2.0
by LongCat Β· Jun 29, 2026
33.5N/AN/A
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)
#75 GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Dec 22, 2025
33.735117 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (low)
#76 GPT-5.6 Luna (low)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
33.325185 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V3.2 (Reasoning)
#77 V3.2 (Reasoning)
by DeepSeek Β· Dec 1, 2025
32.039N/A
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)
#78 Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· Oct 15, 2025
29.624151 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
#79 V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
by DeepSeek Β· Sep 22, 2025
30.415N/A
Google AI provider logo - Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
#80 Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
by Google Β· Apr 2, 2026
29.4N/A36 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)
#81 Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Feb 24, 2026
27.630147 tok/s
InclusionAI AI provider logo - Ring-2.6-1T
#82 Ring-2.6-1T
by InclusionAI Β· May 8, 2026
30.637129 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.3 (high)
#83 Grok 4.3 (high)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026
37.634123 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
#84 Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Apr 16, 2026
31.648134 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - o1
#85 o1
by OpenAI Β· Dec 5, 2024
23.43N/A
StepFun AI provider logo - Step 3.7 Flash
#86 Step 3.7 Flash
by StepFun Β· May 29, 2026
30.352401 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026)
#87 GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026)
by OpenAI Β· Jun 25, 2026
28.96N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
#88 GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
26.620186 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
#89 Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
by Google Β· Apr 2, 2026
25.739N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5 (high)
#90 GPT-5 (high)
by OpenAI Β· Aug 7, 2025
34.719111 tok/s
NVIDIA AI provider logo - Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
#91 Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
by NVIDIA Β· Mar 11, 2026
25.446172 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude 4 Sonnet (Reasoning)
#92 Claude 4 Sonnet (Reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· May 22, 2025
28.98N/A
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
#93 Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Feb 24, 2026
24.033166 tok/s
Cohere AI provider logo - North Mini Code
#94 North Mini Code
by Cohere Β· Jun 9, 2026
19.8N/A96 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
#95 Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 24, 2025
27.1N/AN/A
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3 Coder Next
#96 Qwen3 Coder Next
by Alibaba Β· Feb 3, 2026
21.12496 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
#97 Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026
24.81793 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
#98 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
by Google Β· Mar 3, 2026
25.038315 tok/s
Amazon AI provider logo - Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium)
#99 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium)
by Amazon Β· Nov 27, 2025
21.813134 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - o1-preview
#100 o1-preview
by OpenAI Β· Sep 12, 2024
17.02N/A

Showing 100 of 578 models

Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard

This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.

Core AI Benchmarks Explained

MMLU-ProTests broad knowledge across 14 academic subjects
GPQAPhD-level reasoning & problem-solving
AIME 2025Elite mathematical reasoning
Coding IndexLiveCodeBench + SciCode composite
Math IndexAIME + MATH-500 composite

Key Metrics to Consider

Token PricingInput vs output cost per 1M tokens
Inference SpeedTokens/sec for response time
Release DateLatest techniques & knowledge
Benchmark Scores0-100% capability comparison

How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case

For Research & Analysis

Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation

For Cost Optimization

Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks

For Math & STEM

Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications

All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?

MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.

What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?

GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.

What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?

AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.

How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?

AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.

Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?

Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.

How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?

Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.

What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?

Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.

Can I test these AI models for free before committing?

Yes! Try our free AI chat interface to test different models instantly without creating an account. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.