AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)
Best AI Coding Models
Language models ranked by Artificial Analysis Index
Best Picks
Start with these models
Quick recommendations from the current benchmark, speed, and pricing data.
Model AI model name and provider organization | Intelligence Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - composite reasoning and capability score across the benchmark suite | Value Score Quality, speed, and blended token price combined into a relative value score | Speed Inference throughput in tokens per second - how fast the model generates responses | Context Maximum context window size - how much text, code, or conversation the model can process at once | Price Cost per 1 million tokens β input (text you send) / output (text the model generates) | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 57.7 | 12 | 65 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#2 GPT-5.6 Sol (max) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 58.9 | 12 | 67 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#3 GPT-5.6 Sol (high) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 55.9 | 11 | 57 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#4 GPT-5.6 Terra (max) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 55.0 | 26 | 157 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.50/$15.00 | |
#5 Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) by Anthropic Β· Jun 9, 2026 | 59.9 | 9 | 70 tok/s | 1.0M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
Chat with leading AI modelsUse Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi. EU-hosted inferenceServers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements. | ||||||
#6 GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 53.6 | 11 | 60 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#7 K3 by Kimi Β· Jul 16, 2026 | 57.1 | 16 | 38 tok/s | 1.0M | $3.00/$15.00 | |
#8 GPT-5.5 (xhigh) by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026 | 54.8 | 13 | 90 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#9 Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by Anthropic Β· May 28, 2026 | 55.7 | 12 | 63 tok/s | 1.0M | $5.00/$25.00 | |
#10 Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by Anthropic Β· Apr 16, 2026 | 53.5 | 11 | 61 tok/s | 1.0M | $5.00/$25.00 | |
#11 Grok 4.5 (high) by SpaceXAI Β· Jul 8, 2026 | 53.8 | 22 | 77 tok/s | 500K | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#12 GPT-5.5 (high) by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026 | 53.1 | 11 | 77 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#13 Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by Anthropic Β· Jun 30, 2026 | 53.4 | 21 | 88 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#14 GPT-5.5 (medium) by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026 | 50.4 | 10 | 76 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#15 GPT-5.6 Luna (max) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 51.2 | 38 | 203 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$6.00 | |
#16 Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) by Meta Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 50.6 | 39 | 122 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.25/$4.25 | |
#17 GPT-5.4 (xhigh) by OpenAI Β· Mar 5, 2026 | 51.4 | 24 | 152 tok/s | 272K | $2.50/$15.00 | |
#18 GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 51.6 | 25 | 131 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.50/$15.00 | |
#19 Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) by Google Β· May 19, 2026 | 50.2 | 31 | 287 tok/s | 131K | $1.50/$9.00 | |
#20 GPT-5.6 Sol (low) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 49.4 | 10 | 56 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#21 Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) by Google Β· Jul 21, 2026 | 50.1 | 33 | 311 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.50/$7.50 | |
#22 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google Β· Feb 19, 2026 | 46.5 | 25 | 136 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$12.00 | |
#23 GLM-5.2 (max) by Z AI Β· Jun 16, 2026 | 51.1 | 39 | 196 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.40/$4.40 | |
#24 GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 49.1 | 37 | 197 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$6.00 | |
#25 GPT-5.6 Terra (high) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 49.0 | 23 | 131 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.50/$15.00 | |
#26 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) by Anthropic Β· Jun 30, 2026 | 41.7 | 14 | 61 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#27 Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba Β· May 19, 2026 | 46.0 | 27 | 207 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.50/$7.50 | |
#28 GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 41.2 | 8 | 55 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#29 GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 45.6 | 20 | 118 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.50/$15.00 | |
#30 GPT-5.6 Luna (high) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 46.1 | 35 | 199 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$6.00 | |
#31 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by Anthropic Β· Feb 17, 2026 | 47.2 | 13 | 72 tok/s | 1.0M | $3.00/$15.00 | |
#32 Motif 3 (Beta) by Motif Technologies Β· N/A | 44.1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#33 K2.6 by Kimi Β· Apr 20, 2026 | 44.2 | 23 | 56 tok/s | 262K | $0.95/$4.00 | |
#34 GPT-5.5 (low) by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026 | 43.5 | 9 | 76 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#35 K2.7 Code by Kimi Β· Jun 12, 2026 | 41.9 | 22 | 47 tok/s | 262K | $0.95/$4.00 | |
#36 MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi Β· Apr 22, 2026 | 42.2 | 39 | 58 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.43/$0.87 | |
#37 KAT Coder Pro V2 by KwaiKAT Β· Mar 27, 2026 | 33.7 | 31 | N/A | N/A | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#38 V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026 | 44.3 | 41 | 73 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.43/$0.87 | |
#39 Nex-N2-Pro by Nex AGI Β· Jun 2, 2026 | 41.0 | 46 | 136 tok/s | 262K | $0.50/$2.50 | |
#40 Hy3 by Tencent Β· Jul 6, 2026 | 41.2 | N/A | 60 tok/s | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#41 V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026 | 43.1 | 40 | 68 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.43/$0.87 | |
#42 Muse Spark by Meta Β· Apr 8, 2026 | 43.1 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#43 M3 by MiniMax Β· Jun 1, 2026 | 44.4 | 54 | 97 tok/s | 524K | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#44 GPT-5.6 Terra (low) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 40.5 | 19 | 123 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.50/$15.00 | |
#45 MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi Β· Apr 22, 2026 | 37.2 | 60 | 64 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.14/$0.28 | |
#46 GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026 | 35.4 | 7 | 75 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#47 V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026 | 40.3 | 100 | 115 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.14/$0.28 | |
#48 GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh) by OpenAI Β· Mar 17, 2026 | 40.0 | 35 | 180 tok/s | 400K | $0.75/$4.50 | |
#49 GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) by OpenAI Β· Mar 17, 2026 | 38.2 | 63 | 163 tok/s | 400K | $0.20/$1.25 | |
#50 Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba Β· Jun 1, 2026 | 39.0 | 32 | 53 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.40/$1.60 | |
#51 GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI Β· Apr 7, 2026 | 40.2 | 21 | 84 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.40/$4.40 | |
#52 Qwen3.6 Plus by Alibaba Β· Apr 2, 2026 | 39.6 | 25 | 53 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.50/$3.00 | |
#53 Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba Β· Apr 22, 2026 | 37.1 | 22 | 60 tok/s | 262K | $0.60/$3.60 | |
#54 M2.7 by MiniMax Β· Mar 18, 2026 | 38.1 | 36 | 59 tok/s | 197K | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#55 JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by China Mobile Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 38.8 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#56 GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 34.0 | 15 | 118 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.50/$15.00 | |
#57 Inkling (xhigh) by Thinking Machines Β· Jul 15, 2026 | 40.7 | 17 | N/A | 524K | $1.87/$4.68 | |
#58 Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic Β· Sep 29, 2025 | 36.4 | 10 | 67 tok/s | 1.0M | $3.00/$15.00 | |
#59 V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort) by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026 | 37.5 | 61 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.14/$0.28 | |
#60 Grok Build 0.1 0616 by SpaceXAI Β· Jun 16, 2026 | 39.8 | 24 | 56 tok/s | 256K | $1.00/$2.00 | |
#61 GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 38.1 | 29 | 182 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$6.00 | |
#62 MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) by Xiaomi Β· Dec 16, 2025 | 24.7 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#63 GPT-5.1 (high) by OpenAI Β· Nov 13, 2025 | 36.9 | 20 | 110 tok/s | 400K | $1.25/$10.00 | |
#64 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google Β· Jul 21, 2026 | 36.5 | 45 | 600 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.30/$2.50 | |
#65 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA Β· Jun 4, 2026 | 37.8 | 39 | 215 tok/s | 512K | $0.68/$2.67 | |
#66 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba Β· Feb 16, 2026 | 33.7 | 20 | 61 tok/s | 262K | $0.60/$3.60 | |
#67 Medium 3.5 by Mistral Β· Apr 29, 2026 | 29.9 | 19 | 135 tok/s | 262K | $1.50/$7.50 | |
#68 K2.5 (Reasoning) by Kimi Β· Jan 27, 2026 | 35.4 | 22 | 50 tok/s | 262K | $0.60/$3.00 | |
#69 Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) by Google Β· Mar 25, 2025 | 23.0 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#70 Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba Β· Apr 22, 2026 | 30.5 | 18 | 60 tok/s | 262K | $0.60/$3.60 | |
#71 GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) by Z AI Β· Jun 16, 2026 | 34.1 | 23 | 112 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.40/$4.40 | |
#72 GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) by Z AI Β· Sep 30, 2025 | 28.7 | 20 | 46 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.55/$2.20 | |
#73 Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba Β· Feb 24, 2026 | 32.3 | 35 | 140 tok/s | 262K | $0.40/$3.20 | |
#74 2.0 by LongCat Β· Jun 29, 2026 | 33.5 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#75 GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) by Z AI Β· Dec 22, 2025 | 33.7 | 35 | 117 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.60/$2.20 | |
#76 GPT-5.6 Luna (low) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 33.3 | 25 | 185 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$6.00 | |
#77 V3.2 (Reasoning) by DeepSeek Β· Dec 1, 2025 | 32.0 | 39 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.28/$0.42 | |
#78 Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic Β· Oct 15, 2025 | 29.6 | 24 | 151 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.00/$5.00 | |
#79 V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) by DeepSeek Β· Sep 22, 2025 | 30.4 | 15 | N/A | 1.0M | $1.64/$2.75 | |
#80 Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) by Google Β· Apr 2, 2026 | 29.4 | N/A | 36 tok/s | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#81 Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba Β· Feb 24, 2026 | 27.6 | 30 | 147 tok/s | 262K | $0.40/$3.20 | |
#82 Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI Β· May 8, 2026 | 30.6 | 37 | 129 tok/s | 262K | $0.30/$2.50 | |
#83 Grok 4.3 (high) by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026 | 37.6 | 34 | 123 tok/s | 500K | $1.25/$2.50 | |
#84 Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba Β· Apr 16, 2026 | 31.6 | 48 | 134 tok/s | 262K | $0.25/$1.49 | |
#85 o1 by OpenAI Β· Dec 5, 2024 | 23.4 | 3 | N/A | N/A | $15.00/$60.00 | |
#86 Step 3.7 Flash by StepFun Β· May 29, 2026 | 30.3 | 52 | 401 tok/s | 256K | $0.20/$1.15 | |
#87 GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) by OpenAI Β· Jun 25, 2026 | 28.9 | 6 | N/A | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#88 GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026 | 26.6 | 20 | 186 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$6.00 | |
#89 Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) by Google Β· Apr 2, 2026 | 25.7 | 39 | N/A | 262K | $0.13/$0.40 | |
#90 GPT-5 (high) by OpenAI Β· Aug 7, 2025 | 34.7 | 19 | 111 tok/s | 400K | $1.25/$10.00 | |
#91 Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA Β· Mar 11, 2026 | 25.4 | 46 | 172 tok/s | 262K | $0.25/$0.78 | |
#92 Claude 4 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic Β· May 22, 2025 | 28.9 | 8 | N/A | 1.0M | $3.00/$15.00 | |
#93 Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba Β· Feb 24, 2026 | 24.0 | 33 | 166 tok/s | 262K | $0.25/$2.00 | |
#94 North Mini Code by Cohere Β· Jun 9, 2026 | 19.8 | N/A | 96 tok/s | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#95 Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic Β· Feb 24, 2025 | 27.1 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#96 Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba Β· Feb 3, 2026 | 21.1 | 24 | 96 tok/s | 262K | $0.35/$1.20 | |
#97 Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026 | 24.8 | 17 | 93 tok/s | 500K | $1.25/$2.50 | |
#98 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google Β· Mar 3, 2026 | 25.0 | 38 | 315 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.25/$1.50 | |
#99 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) by Amazon Β· Nov 27, 2025 | 21.8 | 13 | 134 tok/s | N/A | $1.25/$10.00 | |
#100 o1-preview by OpenAI Β· Sep 12, 2024 | 17.0 | 2 | N/A | N/A | $16.50/$66.00 | |
Showing 100 of 578 models
Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard
This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.
Core AI Benchmarks Explained
Key Metrics to Consider
How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case
For Research & Analysis
Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation
For Cost Optimization
Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks
For Math & STEM
Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications
All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?
MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.
What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?
GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.
What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?
AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.
How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?
AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.
Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?
Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.
How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?
Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.
What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?
Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.
Can I test these AI models for free before committing?
Yes! Try our free AI chat interface to test different models instantly without creating an account. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.