Model Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
vs. GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Anthropic, OpenAI
Recommended Pick
OpGPT-5.6 Sol (max)11 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
66.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
77.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-5.6 Sol (max).
Reasoning gap
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) leads Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) by 13.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) leads Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) by 41.0 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | An Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) | Top Pick Op GPT-5.6 Sol (max) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $5.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $30.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $11.25/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release Date | Feb 24, 2025 | Jul 9, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 80.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 84124ms |
| Latency | — | 84124ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 52.9 | 66.7 |
| Intelligence | 27.1 | 58.9 |
| Coding | 36.4 | 77.4 |
| Math | 56.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 77.2% | 94.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 83.7% | — |
| HLE | 10.3% | 47.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 47.3% | — |
| MATH 500 | 94.7% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 56.3% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 48.7% | — |
| SciCode | 40.3% | 56.1% |
| LCR | 60.7% | 73.7% |
| IFBench | 48.3% | 72.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 54.7% | 85.1% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 21.2% | 65.9% |
Key Takeaways
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 66.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) reaches a 77.4 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
