Model Comparison
Claude 3 Haiku
vs. Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Anthropic, Nous Research
Recommended Pick
No Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B 11 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Output price, Blended price
Best Value
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
100.0 value score
22.2 reasoning / $0.30/1M
Lowest Price
Claude 3 Haiku
$0.25/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
22.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude 3 Haiku
6.7 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Claude 3 Haiku is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens than Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B.
Reasoning gap
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B leads Claude 3 Haiku by 3.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B wins 11 measurable categories, including Value, Output price, Blended price, Throughput.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
Nous Research
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | An Claude 3 Haiku | Top Pick No Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.25/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.25/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.50/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Anthropic | Nous Research |
| Release Date | Mar 4, 2024 | Aug 15, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 32.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 359ms |
| Latency | — | 359ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 50.8 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 18.8 | 22.2 |
| Intelligence | 12.3 | 10.6 |
| Coding | 6.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 37.4% | 40.1% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 57.1% |
| HLE | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 15.4% | 18.8% |
| MATH 500 | 39.4% | 53.8% |
| AIME (Original) | 1.0% | 2.3% |
| SciCode | 18.6% | 23.1% |
| LCR | 21.0% | — |
| IFBench | 36.1% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 21.1% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.8% | — |
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Haiku offers the best value at $0.25/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 22.2 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude 3 Haiku reaches a 6.7 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Claude 3 Haiku
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
