Model Comparison
DeepHermes 3 - Llama-3.1 8B Preview (Non-reasoning)
vs. Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Nous Research, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) 5 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
DeepHermes 3 - Llama-3.1 8B Preview (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)
19.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)
8.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) leads DeepHermes 3 - Llama-3.1 8B Preview (Non-reasoning) by 6.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) wins 5 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, HLE.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
DeepHermes 3 - Llama-3.1 8B Preview (Non-reasoning)
Nous Research
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | No DeepHermes 3 - Llama-3.1 8B Preview (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Go Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Nous Research | |
| Release Date | Feb 13, 2025 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 12.1 | 19.0 |
| Intelligence | 7.6 | 12.1 |
| Coding | — | 8.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 27.0% | 40.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 36.5% | — |
| HLE | 4.3% | 4.5% |
| LiveCodeBench | 8.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | 21.8% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 0.0% | — |
| SciCode | 9.1% | 20.4% |
| LCR | — | 15.0% |
| IFBench | — | 33.6% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 22.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
DeepHermes 3 - Llama-3.1 8B Preview (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 19.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 8.3 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
DeepHermes 3 - Llama-3.1 8B Preview (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
