Model Comparison
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning)
vs. JT-MINI
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Nous Research, China Mobile
Recommended Pick
Ch JT-MINI 5 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
JT-MINI
33.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
JT-MINI
21.2 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
JT-MINI leads DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning) by 9.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
JT-MINI wins 5 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, HLE.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning)
Nous Research
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
JT-MINI
China Mobile
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | No DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Ch JT-MINI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Nous Research | China Mobile |
| Release Date | Mar 13, 2025 | Apr 15, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 23.4 | 33.2 |
| Intelligence | 10.9 | 25.4 |
| Coding | — | 21.2 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 38.2% | 67.6% |
| MMLU Pro | 58.0% | — |
| HLE | 3.9% | 6.6% |
| LiveCodeBench | 19.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | 59.5% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 4.7% | — |
| SciCode | 22.8% | 27.2% |
| LCR | — | 11.7% |
| IFBench | — | 36.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 93.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 18.2% |
Key Takeaways
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
JT-MINI has the strongest reasoning profile with a 33.2 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
JT-MINI reaches a 21.2 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
JT-MINI
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
