Model Comparison
R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
vs. Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) 7 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
42.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
22.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) leads R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B by 21.1 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) wins 7 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, HLE.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B | Top Pick Go Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.13/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.20/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | |
| Release Date | Jan 20, 2025 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 21.8 | 42.9 |
| Intelligence | 9.1 | 31.2 |
| Coding | — | 22.4 |
| Math | 22.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 9.8% | 79.2% |
| MMLU Pro | 26.9% | — |
| HLE | 3.3% | 18.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 7.0% | — |
| MATH 500 | 68.7% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 22.0% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 17.7% | — |
| SciCode | 6.6% | 40.0% |
| LCR | 0.3% | 55.7% |
| IFBench | 13.2% | 72.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 43.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 13.6% |
Key Takeaways
R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 42.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) reaches a 22.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
