Model Comparison
V3 0324
vs. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Google
Recommended Pick
De V3 0324 3 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, MATH 500
Lowest Price
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V3 0324
45.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
V3 0324
22.0 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than V3 0324.
Reasoning gap
V3 0324 leads Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24) by 15.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
V3 0324 wins 3 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, MATH 500.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V3 0324
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick De V3 0324 | Go Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.20/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.25/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.21/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | |
| Release Date | Mar 25, 2025 | Dec 19, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 45.9 | 30.1 |
| Intelligence | 22.3 | 12.3 |
| Coding | 22.0 | — |
| Math | 41.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 65.5% | — |
| MMLU Pro | 81.9% | — |
| HLE | 5.2% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 40.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | 94.2% | 48.0% |
| AIME 2025 | 41.0% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 52.0% | — |
| SciCode | 35.8% | — |
| LCR | 41.0% | — |
| IFBench | 41.0% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 47.1% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 15.2% | — |
Key Takeaways
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V3 0324 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 45.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
V3 0324 reaches a 22.0 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V3 0324
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
