Model Comparison
V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
vs. MiMo-V2.5
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2.5 15 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5
100.0 value score
53.0 reasoning / $0.18/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.5
$0.14/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2.5
53.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5
42.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.5 is 4.0x cheaper on input tokens than V3.1 (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2.5 leads V3.1 (Non-reasoning) by 11.6 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5 leads V3.1 (Non-reasoning) by 13.7 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2.5 wins 15 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De V3.1 (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.56/1M | $0.14/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.67/1M | $0.28/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.83/1M | $0.18/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Aug 21, 2025 | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 79.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 3278ms |
| Latency | — | 28448ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 16.4 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 41.5 | 53.0 |
| Intelligence | 28.1 | 49.0 |
| Coding | 28.4 | 42.1 |
| Math | 49.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 73.5% | 84.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 83.3% | — |
| HLE | 6.3% | 25.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 57.7% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 49.7% | — |
| SciCode | 36.7% | 43.1% |
| LCR | 45.0% | 62.7% |
| IFBench | 37.8% | 67.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 34.8% | 90.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 24.2% | 41.7% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.5 offers the best value at $0.14/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2.5 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5 reaches a 42.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
MiMo-V2.5
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
