Model Comparison
V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.5 Omni Flash 9 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
100.0 value score
33.4 reasoning / $0.28/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
40.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 5.6x cheaper on input tokens than V3.1 (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
V3.1 (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen3.5 Omni Flash by 6.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash wins 9 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De V3.1 (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 Omni Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.56/1M | $0.10/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.67/1M | $0.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.83/1M | $0.28/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Aug 21, 2025 | Mar 30, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 244.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1036ms |
| Latency | — | 1036ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 39.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 40.0 | 33.4 |
| Intelligence | 21.0 | 19.0 |
| Math | 49.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 73.5% | 74.2% |
| MMLU Pro | 83.3% | — |
| HLE | 6.3% | 7.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 57.7% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 49.7% | — |
| SciCode | 36.7% | 25.5% |
| LCR | 45.0% | 44.0% |
| IFBench | 37.8% | 38.0% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 34.8% | 84.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 24.2% | 8.3% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V3.1 (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 40.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
