Model Comparison
V3.1 (Reasoning)
vs. Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) 12 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, Throughput
Lowest Price
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V3.1 (Reasoning)
59.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
38.7 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than V3.1 (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
V3.1 (Reasoning) leads Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) by 10.4 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) leads V3.1 (Reasoning) by 9.0 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) wins 12 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Throughput, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V3.1 (Reasoning)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De V3.1 (Reasoning) | Top Pick Go Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.59/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.69/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.86/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | |
| Release Date | Aug 21, 2025 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 34.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 937ms |
| Latency | — | 51332ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 59.6 | 49.2 |
| Intelligence | 27.7 | 39.2 |
| Coding | 29.7 | 38.7 |
| Math | 89.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 77.9% | 85.7% |
| MMLU Pro | 85.1% | — |
| HLE | 13.0% | 22.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | 78.4% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 89.7% | — |
| SciCode | 39.1% | 43.4% |
| LCR | 53.3% | 62.0% |
| IFBench | 41.5% | 75.6% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 37.4% | 59.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 25.0% | 36.4% |
Key Takeaways
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V3.1 (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 59.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) reaches a 38.7 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V3.1 (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
