Model Comparison
V3.1 (Reasoning)
vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro 14 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
100.0 value score
58.1 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$0.43/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V3.1 (Reasoning)
59.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
45.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 1.4x cheaper on input tokens than V3.1 (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
V3.1 (Reasoning) leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro by 1.5 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads V3.1 (Reasoning) by 15.8 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins 14 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V3.1 (Reasoning)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De V3.1 (Reasoning) | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.59/1M | $0.43/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.69/1M | $0.87/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.86/1M | $0.54/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Aug 21, 2025 | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 38.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 2472ms |
| Latency | — | 54737ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 64.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 59.6 | 58.1 |
| Intelligence | 27.7 | 53.8 |
| Coding | 29.7 | 45.5 |
| Math | 89.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 77.9% | 86.6% |
| MMLU Pro | 85.1% | — |
| HLE | 13.0% | 33.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | 78.4% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 89.7% | — |
| SciCode | 39.1% | 50.2% |
| LCR | 53.3% | 73.3% |
| IFBench | 41.5% | 79.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 37.4% | 94.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 25.0% | 43.2% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.5-Pro offers the best value at $0.43/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V3.1 (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 59.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro reaches a 45.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V3.1 (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
