Model Comparison
V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
vs. gpt-oss-120b (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · DeepSeek, OpenAI
Recommended Pick
De V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Intelligence, Coding, GPQA
Best Value
gpt-oss-120b (high)
100.0 value score
63.4 reasoning / $0.26/1M
Lowest Price
gpt-oss-120b (high)
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
gpt-oss-120b (high)
63.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
47.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
gpt-oss-120b (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
gpt-oss-120b (high) is 2.9x cheaper on input tokens than V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort).
Speed gap
gpt-oss-120b (high) generates about 6.4x as many tokens per second as V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort).
Reasoning gap
gpt-oss-120b (high) leads V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) by 4.6 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) leads gpt-oss-120b (high) by 18.9 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
gpt-oss-120b (high)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick De V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Op gpt-oss-120b (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.43/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.87/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.54/1M | $0.26/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Release Date | Apr 24, 2026 | Aug 5, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 55.5 tok/s | 352.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1062ms | 519ms |
| Latency | 79959ms | 6198ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 44.7 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 58.7 | 63.4 |
| Intelligence | 51.5 | 33.3 |
| Coding | 47.5 | 28.6 |
| Math | — | 93.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 88.8% | 78.2% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 80.8% |
| HLE | 35.9% | 18.5% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 87.8% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 93.4% |
| SciCode | 50.0% | 38.9% |
| LCR | 66.3% | 50.7% |
| IFBench | 76.5% | 69.0% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 96.2% | 65.8% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 46.2% | 23.5% |
Key Takeaways
gpt-oss-120b (high) offers the best value at $0.15/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
gpt-oss-120b (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 63.4 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) reaches a 47.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
- Code generation
- Software development
gpt-oss-120b (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
