Model Comparison
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
vs. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · DeepSeek, NVIDIA
Recommended Pick
NV Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) 8 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, TTFT, Reasoning
Best Value
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
39.6 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
$0.43/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
53.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
38.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) is 1.6x cheaper on input tokens than Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning).
Speed gap
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) generates about 3.1x as many tokens per second as V4 Pro (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) leads V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) by 14.1 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) leads Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by 0.8 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
NVIDIA
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick NV Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.43/1M | $0.68/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.87/1M | $2.67/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.54/1M | $1.18/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Release Date | Apr 24, 2026 | Jun 4, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 52.5 tok/s | 162.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1117ms | 818ms |
| Latency | 1117ms | 14832ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 62.8 |
| Reasoning Score | 39.6 | 53.7 |
| Intelligence | 39.3 | 47.7 |
| Coding | 38.4 | 37.6 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 71.7% | 86.7% |
| HLE | 7.7% | 26.6% |
| SciCode | 42.4% | 39.9% |
| LCR | 45.0% | 67.0% |
| IFBench | 45.8% | 81.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 91.2% | 83.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 36.4% | 36.4% |
Key Takeaways
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.43/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.7 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) reaches a 38.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
