Model Comparison
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)
vs. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · LG AI Research, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) 15 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)
48.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)
37.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) leads Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) by 15.1 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) leads Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) by 34.7 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) wins 15 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)
LG AI Research
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | LG Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) | Top Pick Go Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.50/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $1.13/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | LG AI Research | |
| Release Date | Jul 15, 2025 | Dec 17, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 190.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 5949ms |
| Latency | — | 5949ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 33.2 | 48.3 |
| Intelligence | 8.3 | 35.0 |
| Coding | 3.1 | 37.8 |
| Math | 50.3 | 55.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 51.5% | 81.2% |
| MMLU Pro | 58.8% | 88.2% |
| HLE | 5.8% | 14.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 51.6% | 79.7% |
| AIME 2025 | 50.3% | 55.7% |
| SciCode | 9.3% | 49.9% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 48.0% |
| IFBench | 23.0% | 55.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 16.4% | 43.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.0% | 31.8% |
Key Takeaways
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 48.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) reaches a 37.8 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
