Model Comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
vs. Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Google, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)3 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
$0.14/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
21.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
28.7 coding index
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) leads Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24) by 11.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) leads Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24) by 5.1 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) wins 3 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Go Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | — | $0.14/1M |
| Output Cost | — | $0.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.16/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | Sep 24, 2024 | Mar 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 80.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 2070ms |
| Latency | — | 26830ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 9.9 | 21.8 |
| Intelligence | 9.9 | 21.8 |
| Coding | 23.6 | 28.7 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.14/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 21.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) reaches a 28.7 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sep '24)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
