Model Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
vs. Qwen3 Coder Next
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Google, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 12 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Throughput
Best Value
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
100.0 value score
44.0 reasoning / $0.56/1M
Lowest Price
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
$0.25/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
44.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
30.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 1.4x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Coder Next.
Speed gap
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite generates about 2.9x as many tokens per second as Qwen3 Coder Next.
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads Qwen3 Coder Next by 6.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads Qwen3 Coder Next by 7.2 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 Coder Next
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Al Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.25/1M | $0.35/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.50/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.56/1M | $0.56/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | Mar 3, 2026 | Feb 3, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 317.1 tok/s | 108.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 5199ms | 1272ms |
| Latency | 5199ms | 1272ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 84.4 |
| Reasoning Score | 44.0 | 37.1 |
| Intelligence | 33.5 | 28.3 |
| Coding | 30.1 | 22.9 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 82.2% | 73.7% |
| HLE | 16.2% | 9.3% |
| SciCode | 41.9% | 32.3% |
| LCR | 65.3% | 40.0% |
| IFBench | 77.2% | 35.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 31.3% | 79.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 24.2% | 18.2% |
Key Takeaways
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite offers the best value at $0.25/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the strongest reasoning profile with a 44.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite reaches a 30.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 Coder Next
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
