Model Comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
vs. Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Google, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
100.0 value score
45.0 reasoning / $1.50/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
$0.40/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
62.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
45.0 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is 3.8x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.5 Flash (high).
Speed gap
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) generates about 4.4x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.5 Omni Plus.
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads Qwen3.5 Omni Plus by 17.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads Qwen3.5 Omni Plus by 17.4 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) | Al Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.50/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Output Cost | $9.00/1M | $4.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.38/1M | $1.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | May 19, 2026 | Mar 30, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 224.4 tok/s | 50.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 17221ms | 1322ms |
| Latency | 17221ms | 1322ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 62.0 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 62.8 | 45.0 |
| Intelligence | 55.3 | 38.6 |
| Coding | 45.0 | 27.6 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 92.2% | 82.6% |
| HLE | 41.0% | 13.9% |
| SciCode | 53.1% | 40.5% |
| LCR | 69.3% | 52.7% |
| IFBench | 76.3% | 51.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 95.3% | 88.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 40.9% | 21.2% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus offers the best value at $0.40/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 62.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) reaches a 45.0 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
