Model Comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)
vs. Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Google, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) 10 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)
73.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)
42.6 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) leads Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) by 34.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) leads Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) by 21.3 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) wins 10 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) | Al Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | Dec 17, 2025 | Mar 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 215.7 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 5497ms | — |
| Latency | 5497ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 73.0 | 38.2 |
| Intelligence | 46.4 | 27.3 |
| Coding | 42.6 | 21.3 |
| Math | 97.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 89.8% | 78.6% |
| MMLU Pro | 89.0% | — |
| HLE | 34.7% | 8.6% |
| LiveCodeBench | 90.8% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 97.0% | — |
| SciCode | 50.6% | 27.7% |
| LCR | 66.3% | 38.0% |
| IFBench | 78.0% | 37.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 80.4% | 85.1% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 38.6% | 18.2% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 73.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) reaches a 42.6 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
