Model Comparison
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
vs. K3
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Google, Kimi
Recommended Pick
GoGemini 3 Pro Preview (high)7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
100.0 value score
71.8 reasoning / $4.50/1M
Lowest Price
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
$2.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
71.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
K3
76.2 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens than K3.
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) leads K3 by 6.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
K3
Kimi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) | Ki K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $12.00/1M | $15.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.50/1M | $6.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Kimi | |
| Release Date | Nov 18, 2025 | Jul 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 36.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 5786ms |
| Latency | — | 59986ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 67.9 |
| Reasoning Score | 71.8 | 65.0 |
| Intelligence | 39.6 | 57.1 |
| Coding | — | 76.2 |
| Math | 95.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 90.8% | 93.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 89.8% | — |
| HLE | 37.2% | 44.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 91.7% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 95.7% | — |
| SciCode | 56.1% | 58.7% |
| LCR | 70.7% | 74.7% |
| IFBench | 70.4% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 87.1% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 41.7% | — |
Key Takeaways
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) offers the best value at $2.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 71.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
K3 reaches a 76.2 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
K3
- Code generation
- Software development
