Model Comparison
Gemma 3 27B Instruct
vs. Granite 4.1 3B
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Google, IBM
Recommended Pick
Go Gemma 3 27B Instruct 8 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding
Lowest Price
Granite 4.1 3B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemma 3 27B Instruct
30.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemma 3 27B Instruct
9.6 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Granite 4.1 3B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemma 3 27B Instruct.
Reasoning gap
Gemma 3 27B Instruct leads Granite 4.1 3B by 16.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemma 3 27B Instruct leads Granite 4.1 3B by 4.1 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Gemma 3 27B Instruct wins 8 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemma 3 27B Instruct
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Granite 4.1 3B
IBM
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go Gemma 3 27B Instruct | IB Granite 4.1 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.11/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.25/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | IBM | |
| Release Date | Mar 12, 2025 | Apr 29, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 30.4 | 14.4 |
| Intelligence | 10.3 | 8.5 |
| Coding | 9.6 | 5.5 |
| Math | 20.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 42.8% | 31.4% |
| MMLU Pro | 66.9% | — |
| HLE | 4.7% | 3.4% |
| LiveCodeBench | 13.7% | — |
| MATH 500 | 88.3% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 20.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 25.3% | — |
| SciCode | 21.2% | 11.9% |
| LCR | 5.7% | 3.0% |
| IFBench | 31.8% | 33.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 10.5% | 19.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 3.8% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
Granite 4.1 3B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemma 3 27B Instruct has the strongest reasoning profile with a 30.4 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemma 3 27B Instruct reaches a 9.6 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Granite 4.1 3B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
