Model Comparison
Gemma 3 4B Instruct
vs. MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Google, OpenBMB
Recommended Pick
Op MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B 6 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, Intelligence
Lowest Price
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemma 3 4B Instruct
21.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemma 3 4B Instruct
2.9 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemma 3 4B Instruct.
Reasoning gap
Gemma 3 4B Instruct leads MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B by 5.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemma 3 4B Instruct leads MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B by 2.2 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B wins 6 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemma 3 4B Instruct
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
OpenBMB
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Go Gemma 3 4B Instruct | Top Pick Op MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.04/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.08/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.05/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenBMB | |
| Release Date | Mar 12, 2025 | May 11, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 21.3 | 16.0 |
| Intelligence | 6.3 | 12.7 |
| Coding | 2.9 | 0.7 |
| Math | 12.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 29.1% | 30.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 41.7% | — |
| HLE | 5.2% | 4.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 11.2% | — |
| MATH 500 | 76.6% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 12.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 6.3% | — |
| SciCode | 7.3% | 2.1% |
| LCR | 5.7% | 6.3% |
| IFBench | 28.3% | 26.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 5.0% | 87.7% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Key Takeaways
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemma 3 4B Instruct has the strongest reasoning profile with a 21.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemma 3 4B Instruct reaches a 2.9 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemma 3 4B Instruct
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
