Model Comparison
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
vs. K3
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Google, Kimi
Recommended Pick
KiK39 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Latency, Reasoning
Lowest Price
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
K3
65.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
K3
76.2 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than K3.
Speed gap
K3 generates about 1.6x as many tokens per second as Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
K3 leads Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) by 19.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
K3 leads Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) by 32.8 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
K3 wins 9 measurable categories, including Throughput, Latency, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
K3
Kimi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Go Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) | Top Pick Ki K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $15.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $6.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Kimi | |
| Release Date | Apr 2, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 35.9 tok/s | 58.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 979ms | 1348ms |
| Latency | 49296ms | 35534ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 45.9 | 65.0 |
| Intelligence | 29.4 | 57.1 |
| Coding | 43.4 | 76.2 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 85.7% | 93.5% |
| HLE | 22.7% | 44.3% |
| SciCode | 43.4% | 58.7% |
| LCR | 62.0% | 74.7% |
| IFBench | 75.6% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 59.9% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 36.4% | — |
Key Takeaways
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
K3 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 65.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
K3 reaches a 76.2 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
K3
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
