Model Comparison
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Z AI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) 16 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Blended price
Best Value
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
27.9 reasoning / $0.66/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning)
$0.18/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning)
27.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
10.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) is 3.3x cheaper on input tokens than GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) generates about 3.2x as many tokens per second as GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) leads GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) by 7.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) by 1.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Z GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.60/1M | $0.18/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.80/1M | $2.10/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.90/1M | $0.66/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Z AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Aug 11, 2025 | Oct 14, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 43.2 tok/s | 136.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | 33236ms | 1119ms |
| Latency | 33236ms | 15763ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 54.9 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 20.8 | 27.9 |
| Intelligence | 12.7 | 16.7 |
| Coding | 10.8 | 9.8 |
| Math | 15.3 | 30.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 57.3% | 57.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 75.1% | 74.9% |
| HLE | 3.6% | 3.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 35.2% | 35.3% |
| AIME 2025 | 15.3% | 30.7% |
| SciCode | 18.8% | 21.9% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 31.0% |
| IFBench | 28.6% | 39.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 19.6% | 22.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 6.8% | 3.8% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.18/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 27.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) reaches a 10.8 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
