Model Comparison
GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
vs. M3
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Z AI, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
Mi M3 16 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
M3
100.0 value score
61.6 reasoning / $0.52/1M
Lowest Price
M3
$0.30/1M input price
Best Reasoning
M3
61.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
M3
43.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
M3 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
M3 is 1.8x cheaper on input tokens than GLM-4.6 (Reasoning).
Speed gap
M3 generates about 1.1x as many tokens per second as GLM-4.6 (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
M3 leads GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) by 2.4 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
M3 leads GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) by 13.9 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M3
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Z GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) | Top Pick Mi M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.55/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.20/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.96/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Z AI | MiniMax |
| Release Date | Sep 30, 2025 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 42.5 tok/s | 45.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1527ms | 2580ms |
| Latency | 48591ms | 46484ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 52.4 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 59.2 | 61.6 |
| Intelligence | 32.5 | 54.7 |
| Coding | 29.5 | 43.4 |
| Math | 86.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 78.0% | 92.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 82.9% | — |
| HLE | 13.3% | 37.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 69.5% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 86.0% | — |
| SciCode | 38.4% | 45.4% |
| LCR | 54.3% | 74.0% |
| IFBench | 43.4% | 82.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 70.5% | 88.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 25.0% | 42.4% |
Key Takeaways
M3 offers the best value at $0.30/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
M3 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
M3 reaches a 43.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
M3
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
