Model Comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
vs. Grok 4.3 (low)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Z AI, xAI
Recommended Pick
xA Grok 4.3 (low) 10 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
29.4 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
$0.07/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Grok 4.3 (low)
45.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) is 17.9x cheaper on input tokens than Grok 4.3 (low).
Speed gap
Grok 4.3 (low) generates about 1.7x as many tokens per second as GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Grok 4.3 (low) leads GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) by 16.3 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Grok 4.3 (low) wins 10 measurable categories, including Throughput, Latency, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Grok 4.3 (low)
xAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Z GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) | Top Pick xA Grok 4.3 (low) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.07/1M | $1.25/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.40/1M | $2.50/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | $1.56/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Z AI | xAI |
| Release Date | Jan 19, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 84.1 tok/s | 145.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | 923ms | 4986ms |
| Latency | 24697ms | 4986ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 15.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 29.4 | 45.7 |
| Intelligence | 22.9 | 35.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 58.1% | 84.3% |
| HLE | 7.1% | 17.3% |
| SciCode | 33.7% | 41.9% |
| LCR | 35.0% | 64.0% |
| IFBench | 60.8% | 81.0% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 98.8% | 88.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 22.0% | 26.5% |
Key Takeaways
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.07/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Grok 4.3 (low) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 45.7 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Grok 4.3 (low)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
