Model Comparison
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)
vs. MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Z AI, Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Z GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) 9 metric wins Strongest on: TTFT, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
100.0 value score
48.3 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)
51.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)
35.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) is 14x cheaper on input tokens than GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) generates about 2.6x as many tokens per second as GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) leads MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by 2.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) leads MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by 2.3 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Z GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) | Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.40/1M | $0.10/1M |
| Output Cost | $4.40/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.15/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Z AI | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Apr 7, 2026 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 47.7 tok/s | 125.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1097ms | 1364ms |
| Latency | 1097ms | 17269ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 7.4 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 51.1 | 48.3 |
| Intelligence | 43.8 | 41.5 |
| Coding | 35.8 | 33.5 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 83.9% | 83.5% |
| HLE | 25.6% | 20.0% |
| SciCode | 36.1% | 38.3% |
| LCR | 44.3% | 64.3% |
| IFBench | 52.0% | 71.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 97.1% | 93.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 35.6% | 31.1% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 51.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) reaches a 35.8 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
