Model Comparison
GLM-5.2 (max)
vs. Grok 4.6 (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Z AI, SpaceXAI
Recommended Pick
Z GLM-5.2 (max)8 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
GLM-5.2 (max)
100.0 value score
61.1 reasoning / $2.15/1M
Lowest Price
GLM-5.2 (max)
$1.40/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Grok 4.6 (high)
66.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Grok 4.6 (high)
76.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
GLM-5.2 (max) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
GLM-5.2 (max) is 1.4x cheaper on input tokens than Grok 4.6 (high).
Speed gap
GLM-5.2 (max) generates about 1.8x as many tokens per second as Grok 4.6 (high).
Reasoning gap
Grok 4.6 (high) leads GLM-5.2 (max) by 5.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Grok 4.6 (high) leads GLM-5.2 (max) by 8.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GLM-5.2 (max)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Grok 4.6 (high)
SpaceXAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Z GLM-5.2 (max) | Sp Grok 4.6 (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.40/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $4.40/1M | $6.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.15/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Z AI | SpaceXAI |
| Release Date | Jun 16, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 119.2 tok/s | 67.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | 978ms | 49322ms |
| Latency | 17754ms | 49322ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 77.7 |
| Reasoning Score | 61.1 | 66.2 |
| Intelligence | 52.6 | 60.9 |
| Coding | 68.8 | 76.8 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 89.5% | 94.9% |
| HLE | 41.1% | 42.9% |
| SciCode | 50.5% | 53.6% |
| LCR | 76.7% | 75.0% |
| IFBench | 73.3% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 99.1% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 50.8% | — |
Key Takeaways
GLM-5.2 (max) offers the best value at $1.40/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Grok 4.6 (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 66.2 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Grok 4.6 (high) reaches a 76.8 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GLM-5.2 (max)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Grok 4.6 (high)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
