Model Comparison
GLM-5.2 (max)
vs. Motif 3 (Beta)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Z AI, Motif Technologies
Recommended Pick
Z GLM-5.2 (max)8 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Motif 3 (Beta)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GLM-5.2 (max)
61.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GLM-5.2 (max)
68.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Motif 3 (Beta) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than GLM-5.2 (max).
Reasoning gap
GLM-5.2 (max) leads Motif 3 (Beta) by 3.5 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GLM-5.2 (max) leads Motif 3 (Beta) by 6.8 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
GLM-5.2 (max) wins 8 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GLM-5.2 (max)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Motif 3 (Beta)
Motif Technologies
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Z GLM-5.2 (max) | Mo Motif 3 (Beta) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.40/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $4.40/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.15/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Z AI | Motif Technologies |
| Release Date | Jun 16, 2026 | Jul 14, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 119.2 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 978ms | — |
| Latency | 17754ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 61.1 | 57.5 |
| Intelligence | 52.6 | 45.3 |
| Coding | 68.8 | 62.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 89.5% | 86.9% |
| HLE | 41.1% | 40.4% |
| SciCode | 50.5% | 44.3% |
| LCR | 76.7% | 70.7% |
| IFBench | 73.3% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 99.1% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 50.8% | — |
Key Takeaways
Motif 3 (Beta) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GLM-5.2 (max) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.1 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GLM-5.2 (max) reaches a 68.8 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GLM-5.2 (max)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Motif 3 (Beta)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
