Model Comparison
GLM-5.2 (max)
vs. Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Z AI, Meta
Recommended Pick
MeMuse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)9 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
100.0 value score
61.8 reasoning / $2.00/1M
Lowest Price
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
$1.25/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
61.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
71.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) is 1.1x cheaper on input tokens than GLM-5.2 (max).
Speed gap
GLM-5.2 (max) generates about 1.3x as many tokens per second as Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh).
Reasoning gap
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) leads GLM-5.2 (max) by 1.6 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) leads GLM-5.2 (max) by 2.5 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GLM-5.2 (max)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
Meta
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Z GLM-5.2 (max) | Top Pick Me Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.40/1M | $1.25/1M |
| Output Cost | $4.40/1M | $4.25/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.15/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Z AI | Meta |
| Release Date | Jun 16, 2026 | Jul 9, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 169.4 tok/s | 127.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | 859ms | 911ms |
| Latency | 12662ms | 16559ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 90.6 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 60.2 | 61.8 |
| Intelligence | 51.1 | 50.6 |
| Coding | 68.8 | 71.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 89.5% | 89.8% |
| HLE | 40.1% | 45.1% |
| SciCode | 50.5% | 58.2% |
| LCR | 71.3% | 63.3% |
| IFBench | 73.3% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 99.1% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 50.8% | — |
Key Takeaways
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) offers the best value at $1.25/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) reaches a 71.3 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GLM-5.2 (max)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
