Model Comparison
GLM-5.3 (Max)
vs. Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Z AI, InclusionAI
Recommended Pick
Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
100.0 value score
43.9 reasoning / $0.45/1M
Lowest Price
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
$0.30/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GLM-5.3 (Max)
44.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GLM-5.3 (Max)
74.8 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 4.7x cheaper on input tokens than GLM-5.3 (Max).
Reasoning gap
GLM-5.3 (Max) leads Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by 0.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 wins 4 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GLM-5.3 (Max)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
InclusionAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use open-weight models like DeepSeek, Qwen and Kimi in one app.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Z GLM-5.3 (Max) | Top Pick In Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.40/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $4.40/1M | $0.90/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.15/1M | $0.45/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Z AI | InclusionAI |
| Release Date | Aug 18, 2026 | Oct 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 77.7 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 2900ms | — |
| Latency | 28630ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 21.4 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 44.8 | 43.9 |
| Intelligence | 44.8 | 43.9 |
| Coding | 74.8 | — |
Key Takeaways
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 offers the best value at $0.30/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GLM-5.3 (Max) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 44.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GLM-5.3 (Max) reaches a 74.8 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GLM-5.3 (Max)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
