Model Comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
vs. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · OpenAI, NVIDIA
Recommended Pick
NV Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) 13 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
16.9 reasoning / $0.09/1M
Lowest Price
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
$0.05/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-4.1 nano
32.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
15.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-4.1 nano.
Speed gap
GPT-4.1 nano generates about 2.0x as many tokens per second as Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
GPT-4.1 nano leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) by 15.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) leads GPT-4.1 nano by 4.6 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
NVIDIA
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op GPT-4.1 nano | Top Pick NV Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.05/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.40/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18/1M | $0.09/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | NVIDIA |
| Release Date | Apr 14, 2025 | Dec 15, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 187.5 tok/s | 93.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 401ms | 311ms |
| Latency | 401ms | 311ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 95.1 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 32.1 | 16.9 |
| Intelligence | 13.0 | 13.2 |
| Coding | 11.2 | 15.8 |
| Math | 24.0 | 13.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 51.2% | 39.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 65.7% | 57.9% |
| HLE | 3.9% | 4.6% |
| LiveCodeBench | 32.6% | 36.0% |
| MATH 500 | 84.8% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 24.0% | 13.3% |
| AIME (Original) | 23.7% | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | 23.0% |
| LCR | 17.0% | 6.7% |
| IFBench | 32.0% | 37.5% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 17.3% | 25.4% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 3.8% | 12.1% |
Key Takeaways
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.05/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-4.1 nano has the strongest reasoning profile with a 32.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 15.8 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-4.1 nano
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
