Model Comparison
GPT-4o (Nov '24)
vs. Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · OpenAI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Op GPT-4o (Nov '24) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-4o (Nov '24)
25.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-4o (Nov '24)
16.7 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-4o (Nov '24).
Reasoning gap
GPT-4o (Nov '24) leads Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B by 1.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
GPT-4o (Nov '24) wins 9 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-4o (Nov '24)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Op GPT-4o (Nov '24) | Al Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.50/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $10.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.38/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Nov 20, 2024 | Sep 19, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 152.8 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 529ms | — |
| Latency | 529ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 25.4 | 24.0 |
| Intelligence | 17.3 | 10.0 |
| Coding | 16.7 | — |
| Math | 6.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 54.3% | 33.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 74.8% | 47.3% |
| HLE | 3.3% | 4.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | 30.9% | 12.6% |
| MATH 500 | 75.9% | 66.0% |
| AIME 2025 | 6.0% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 15.0% | 5.3% |
| SciCode | 33.3% | 14.8% |
| LCR | 0.0% | — |
| IFBench | 34.3% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 25.1% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 8.3% | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-4o (Nov '24) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 25.4 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-4o (Nov '24) reaches a 16.7 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-4o (Nov '24)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
