Model Comparison

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)
vs. Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) has not been available at LLMBase since 26 October 2026. Open alternative: DeepSeek V4 Pro →

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · OpenAI, Anthropic

Recommended Pick

Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)3 metric wins

Strongest on: Throughput, TTFT, Latency

Lowest Price

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)

$1.75/1M input price

Differences That Matter

Price gap

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 4.6x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback).

Speed gap

Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) generates about 1.2x as many tokens per second as GPT-5.2 (Xhigh).

Top-pick rationale

Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) wins 3 measurable categories, including Throughput, TTFT, Latency.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h

GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)

OpenAI

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)

Anthropic

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

EU-hosted open models, one API

Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.

Get API access

Full Comparison

Metric	Op GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) OpenAI	Top Pick An Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) Anthropic
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost	$1.75/1M	$8.00/1M
Output Cost	$14.00/1M	$40.00/1M
Blended (3:1)	$4.81/1M	$16.00/1M
Specifications
Organization	OpenAI	Anthropic
Release Date	Dec 11, 2025	Nov 9, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput	73.0 tok/s	84.9 tok/s
TTFT	213290ms	97290ms
Latency	213290ms	97290ms
Composite Indices
Value Score	—	100.0
Reasoning Score	—	62.2
Intelligence	—	62.2