Model Comparison
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
vs. M3
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · OpenAI, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
Mi M3 10 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Output price, TTFT
Best Value
M3
100.0 value score
61.6 reasoning / $0.52/1M
Lowest Price
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
$0.20/1M input price
Best Reasoning
M3
61.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
43.9 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
M3 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens than M3.
Speed gap
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) generates about 3.2x as many tokens per second as M3.
Reasoning gap
M3 leads GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) by 10.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) leads M3 by 0.5 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M3
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) | Top Pick Mi M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.25/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.46/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Release Date | Mar 17, 2026 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 148.8 tok/s | 47.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2851ms | 2478ms |
| Latency | 2851ms | 44933ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 93.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 50.7 | 61.6 |
| Intelligence | 44.0 | 54.7 |
| Coding | 43.9 | 43.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 81.7% | 92.9% |
| HLE | 26.5% | 37.1% |
| SciCode | 46.9% | 45.4% |
| LCR | 66.0% | 74.0% |
| IFBench | 75.9% | 82.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 76.0% | 88.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 42.4% | 42.4% |
Key Takeaways
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) offers the best value at $0.20/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
M3 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) reaches a 43.9 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
M3
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives 
