Model Comparison
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning)
vs. M3
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · OpenAI, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
Mi M3 12 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Output price, Reasoning
Best Value
M3
100.0 value score
58.1 reasoning / $0.52/1M
Lowest Price
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning)
$0.20/1M input price
Best Reasoning
M3
58.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
M3
43.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
M3 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens than M3.
Speed gap
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) generates about 2.6x as many tokens per second as M3.
Reasoning gap
M3 leads GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) by 32.3 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
M3 leads GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) by 15.5 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M3
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) | Top Pick Mi M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.25/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.46/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Release Date | Mar 17, 2026 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 157.8 tok/s | 60.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 555ms | 1908ms |
| Latency | 555ms | 34959ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 50.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 25.9 | 58.1 |
| Intelligence | 17.6 | 44.4 |
| Coding | 27.9 | 43.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 55.8% | 92.9% |
| HLE | 4.2% | 37.1% |
| SciCode | 35.2% | 45.4% |
| LCR | 24.7% | 74.0% |
| IFBench | 32.7% | 82.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 34.8% | 88.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 24.2% | 42.4% |
Key Takeaways
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.20/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
M3 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
M3 reaches a 43.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
M3
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
