Model Comparison
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
vs. M1 80k
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · OpenAI, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
Op GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Intelligence, Coding
Best Value
M1 80k
100.0 value score
58.1 reasoning / $0.96/1M
Lowest Price
M1 80k
$0.55/1M input price
Best Reasoning
M1 80k
58.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
41.0 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
M1 80k has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
M1 80k is 4.5x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
M1 80k leads GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) by 17.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) leads M1 80k by 26.5 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) wins 9 measurable categories, including Throughput, Intelligence, Coding, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M1 80k
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Op GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) | Mi M1 80k |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.50/1M | $0.55/1M |
| Output Cost | $15.00/1M | $2.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $5.63/1M | $0.96/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Release Date | Mar 5, 2026 | Jun 17, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 67.5 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 780ms | — |
| Latency | 780ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 11.9 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 40.3 | 58.1 |
| Intelligence | 35.4 | 24.4 |
| Coding | 41.0 | 14.5 |
| Math | — | 61.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 74.8% | 69.7% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 81.6% |
| HLE | 10.6% | 8.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 71.1% |
| MATH 500 | — | 98.0% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 61.0% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 84.7% |
| SciCode | 47.1% | 37.4% |
| LCR | 47.3% | 54.3% |
| IFBench | 48.4% | 41.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 35.1% | 34.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 37.9% | 3.0% |
Key Takeaways
M1 80k offers the best value at $0.55/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
M1 80k has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) reaches a 41.0 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
- Code generation
- Software development
M1 80k
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
