Model Comparison
GPT-5 nano (high)
vs. M3
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · OpenAI, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
Mi M3 12 metric wins Strongest on: TTFT, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
GPT-5 nano (high)
100.0 value score
54.0 reasoning / $0.14/1M
Lowest Price
GPT-5 nano (high)
$0.05/1M input price
Best Reasoning
M3
61.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
M3
43.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
GPT-5 nano (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
GPT-5 nano (high) is 6.0x cheaper on input tokens than M3.
Speed gap
GPT-5 nano (high) generates about 2.5x as many tokens per second as M3.
Reasoning gap
M3 leads GPT-5 nano (high) by 7.6 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
M3 leads GPT-5 nano (high) by 23.1 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-5 nano (high)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M3
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op GPT-5 nano (high) | Top Pick Mi M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.05/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.40/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.14/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Release Date | Aug 7, 2025 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 140.6 tok/s | 55.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 80618ms | 2457ms |
| Latency | 80618ms | 38357ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 29.9 |
| Reasoning Score | 54.0 | 61.6 |
| Intelligence | 26.8 | 54.7 |
| Coding | 20.3 | 43.4 |
| Math | 83.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 67.6% | 92.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 78.0% | — |
| HLE | 8.2% | 37.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 78.9% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 83.7% | — |
| SciCode | 36.6% | 45.4% |
| LCR | 41.7% | 74.0% |
| IFBench | 67.6% | 82.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 36.5% | 88.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 12.1% | 42.4% |
Key Takeaways
GPT-5 nano (high) offers the best value at $0.05/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
M3 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
M3 reaches a 43.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-5 nano (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
M3
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
