Model Comparison
GPT-6 Astra (max)
vs. Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · OpenAI, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
AnClaude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)5 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
100.0 value score
54.1 reasoning / $10.00/1M
Lowest Price
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
$5.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-6 Astra (max)
54.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
78.0 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-6 Astra (max).
Reasoning gap
GPT-6 Astra (max) leads Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by 0.6 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) leads GPT-6 Astra (max) by 1.1 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) wins 5 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-6 Astra (max)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op GPT-6 Astra (max) | Top Pick An Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $10.00/1M | $5.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $50.00/1M | $25.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $20.00/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Sep 3, 2026 | Jul 24, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 57.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 85930ms |
| Latency | — | 85930ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 50.6 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 54.7 | 54.1 |
| Intelligence | 54.7 | 54.1 |
| Coding | 76.9 | 78.0 |
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) offers the best value at $5.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-6 Astra (max) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) reaches a 78.0 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-6 Astra (max)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
