Model Comparison
gpt-oss-120b (high)
vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · OpenAI, Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro 9 metric wins Strongest on: Intelligence, Coding, GPQA
Best Value
gpt-oss-120b (high)
100.0 value score
61.5 reasoning / $0.26/1M
Lowest Price
gpt-oss-120b (high)
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
gpt-oss-120b (high)
61.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
45.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
gpt-oss-120b (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
gpt-oss-120b (high) is 2.9x cheaper on input tokens than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Speed gap
gpt-oss-120b (high) generates about 8.6x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Reasoning gap
gpt-oss-120b (high) leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro by 7.3 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads gpt-oss-120b (high) by 16.9 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
gpt-oss-120b (high)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op gpt-oss-120b (high) | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.15/1M | $0.43/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.60/1M | $0.87/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.26/1M | $0.54/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Aug 5, 2025 | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 350.5 tok/s | 40.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 524ms | 1981ms |
| Latency | 6230ms | 51111ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 42.6 |
| Reasoning Score | 61.5 | 54.2 |
| Intelligence | 23.8 | 42.2 |
| Coding | 28.6 | 45.5 |
| Math | 93.4 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 78.2% | 86.6% |
| MMLU Pro | 80.8% | — |
| HLE | 18.5% | 33.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | 87.8% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 93.4% | — |
| SciCode | 38.9% | 50.2% |
| LCR | 50.7% | 73.3% |
| IFBench | 69.0% | 79.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 65.8% | 94.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 23.5% | 43.2% |
Key Takeaways
gpt-oss-120b (high) offers the best value at $0.15/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
gpt-oss-120b (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.5 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro reaches a 45.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
gpt-oss-120b (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Code generation
- Software development
